SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Trading IOMEGA based on technical analysis
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1511 12 0 IOM
Emcee:  Elliot Brenner Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
311 Why don't you learn how to drive before getting that expensive Porche? TherRobert Graham-2/12/1997
310 Bob, there is a Metastock thread on SI. I'm sure you'll find it very hestan s.-2/12/1997
309 ToAll: TA question from newbe.... I am just starting to cut my teeth on TA. GoBob Campbell-2/12/1997
308 Stan, Sorry but I just have to gloat a bit My picks in the last 2 days were donald sew-2/12/1997
307 Donald, it seems we're always looking at the same stocks. I'm in CUBE astan s.-2/12/1997
306 STAN, Rechecked and IOM was definitely a CLASS 1 BUY. I have the RSI at 12.donald sew-2/12/1997
305 I suggest waiting to see what it does at the price support of 16, which is wherRobert Graham-2/11/1997
304 Donald -- Being new to ta myself .Would you mind telling me what you are using Herb Fuller-2/11/1997
303 I think IOM is close to a buy, but given the market sentiment I'm going to stan s.-2/11/1997
302 Stephen, Per the Tech system I use, IOM just became a CLASS 1 BUY = 1-3 point donald sew-2/11/1997
301 Yes Herb, None of my accumulation indicators show the kind of buying one would Stephen M. Neal-2/10/1997
300 Stephen --My opinion-- The overall general market sentiment is very negHerb Fuller-2/9/1997
299 Okay guys and gals. Do we get a bounce here, now that it seems to have held?JGS-2/9/1997
298 Chris, I think I put too many !!!'s after the word prediction. I just did nStephen M. Neal-2/8/1997
297 Stephen, >>It is not a prediction!!<< I used the word "prediChristopher-2/6/1997
296 Guy, My system is telling me that IOM is a class 2 buys. CLASS 2 normally meadonald sew-2/6/1997
295 It is not a prediction!! I based my "statement" on a square of nine cStephen M. Neal-2/6/1997
294 All: I have posted a new chart of IOM with various technical indicators at whiGuy Gordon-2/5/1997
293 Stephen, What are you basing this prediction on? Thanks.....ChristopherChristopher-2/5/1997
292 Stephen, I read your post and became a little confused. Please explain. ArTom Trawinski-2/5/1997
291 Feb. 24 or two trading days either side would be a good timeframe for a turn inStephen M. Neal-2/5/1997
290 Robert, I think you are right. For a matter of fact IOM was trading in large Tamas-2/4/1997
289 This site might help you select one, maybe even for a MAC, good luck!: traders.Tamas-2/4/1997
288 Guy, I haven't used the Chaikin. It appears to mirror price movement. DoesJGS-2/4/1997
287 >Looks like a pretty interesting site but unfortunately.... Angier, Iceberg-2/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News