SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Madge (MADGF)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3379 16 0 MADGF
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3129 NO WAY on the stock re-purchase!! I'll tell you what I'd like to hear T. C. Ballister-9/21/1998
3128 G'day all - not sure if anyone else is hanging on to MADGF. Anyway, I just Bosco-9/19/1998
3127 G'day all - dear wilkie, I ve decided not to look at the tickers of my holdBosco-8/27/1998
3126 Wow! Madge opened up at 2 3/4 with a whole day's worth of volume in the opwilkie-8/27/1998
3125 Maddog days of August Small volume is hurting small stocks. Where and when is tDaniel P. Dwyer-8/20/1998
3124 Ed Your analysis is much the same as mine. Your money at this point is dead inDaniel P. Dwyer-8/19/1998
3123 >The question now is, do the shares of this dictatorship have better prospecEd Frye-8/19/1998
3122 G'day all - dear A and Ed, while I think many are disappointed in the apparBosco-8/19/1998
3121 Yes, you must be very frustrated Ed, as we all are. Alas I bought in some timeA. Fineigler-8/19/1998
3120 >>Madge's brilliant strategy of selling off the part of the company wEd Frye-8/19/1998
3119 Madgf had a good rise today, but on low volume. So perhaps relatively meaningleA. Fineigler-8/19/1998
3118 Less uncertainty ===> Higher price. MADGF trading up $0.50 today (+16%). Ed Frye-8/18/1998
3117 G'day all - dear Ken, thanks for the link and sorry for the belated reply. Bosco-8/18/1998
3116 Kirby, Correction to my previous post. Last sentence was cut short. It shouldDaniel P. Dwyer-8/17/1998
3115 Dan, Since you mentioned this! Have we ever seen Madge and Monica together? NoKirby D. Hames-8/17/1998
3114 Ken, This is excellent news. I am sure Bosco will be relieved. Now the companDaniel P. Dwyer-8/17/1998
3113 Bosco, first my thanks to you and Dan for the excellent discussion on the conveKen Ridge-8/14/1998
3112 G'day all - personally, I am less concerned about its business plan than abBosco-8/13/1998
3111 According to last cc, Madge is expected to unveil their business plan before anDaniel P. Dwyer-8/12/1998
3110 Dear Bosco, I did as you requested: Email sent to John Nesbett. Watching and wRL Toms-8/6/1998
3109 Dear Lewis, Kirby & all - thanks for the support. It is good to see *compatBosco-8/6/1998
3108 diddoKirby D. Hames-8/6/1998
3107 Dear Bosco and Dan: Re. your being the last holdouts of this lot, I wanted to lRL Toms-8/6/1998
3106 <offtopic> Dear Dan - by no means trying to badger you, but thought you mBosco-8/6/1998
3105 Dear Dan - again, we may have to settle to disagree. First, I ve no qualm for bBosco-8/6/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):