SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency?
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3887 2 0
Emcee:  Proud_Infidel Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3137<i>Totally agree with your thoughts....What 20% did they use.... </i>Cola Can-11/30/2000
3136<i>Again, Gore fiddles, Market is DOWN </i> I bet Gore's fellowCola Can-11/30/2000
3135<i>I am not sure if I should be thanking you or not? </i> Thank me?Cola Can-11/30/2000
3134<i>Does anyone care that only 3 counties are counted? I keep hearing "Proud_Infidel-11/30/2000
3133<i>You must be a Republican, Democrats don't concede. They just try anchomolungma-11/30/2000
3132If there is a simple way to state the dilemna here, it is this. Emotions run toSBHX-11/30/2000
3131Democrats should weigh cost of prolonged challenge 11/30/2000 It's time, DProud_Infidel-11/30/2000
3130"> As for the claim that a vote that show no choice for President must bGersh Avery-11/30/2000
3129Those guys are utterly pathetic in their whining. How can anyone at this poinProud_Infidel-11/30/2000
3128"winner is actually the candidate with the second highest vote total" MasonS-11/30/2000
3127<b>Most voters back Bush</b> By Henry Pierson Curtis of the SentinProud_Infidel-11/30/2000
3126You must be a Republican, Democrats don't concede. They just try and changecutiger-11/30/2000
3125Message 14918121 You really are a hard nut...Ellen-11/30/2000
3124Cal Thomas Al Gore's ultimate entitlement jewishworldreview.com -- MOSTcalgal-11/30/2000
3123<i>Gee, wouldn't it be nice if everyone conceded when they lose?</iThe Philosopher-11/30/2000
3122Good for you, to admit a possible error. As I pointed out in a post made beforeThe Philosopher-11/30/2000
3121I will concede to you on the point. Gee, wouldn't it be nice if everyone cochomolungma-11/30/2000
3120chomo, In your small sentence you sumed it all up with just the one word <B&William Brotherson-11/30/2000
3119<i>has to meet conditions #1, #2 AND #3...OR #4</i> What? It appeacutiger-11/30/2000
3118Sorry, you don't know statutory construction. It's standard to put thThe Philosopher-11/30/2000
3117That answers my question to chomo in a later post. Thanks for clarification.Ellen-11/30/2000
3116Ellen, I'm not so sure about what I have posted regarding Texas law is truechomolungma-11/30/2000
3115<i>the Constitution mandates that the voting be done all on one day</i&cutiger-11/30/2000
3114<i>Oh, I see what you are saying. You are saying it has to meet conditionschomolungma-11/30/2000
3113<b>Thompson Calls on Supremes to Nix Boies in Florida</b> Thursday Catfish-11/30/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):