SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Ligand (LGND) Breakout!
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
32384 154 0 LGND
Emcee:  Henry Niman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
31384Yep. More like a leakout than a breakout, but I'll take it.Dave Feldman-3/3/2004
31383Hard to believe that Dr. Niman started this thread in 1996.....and finally LGND Arthur Radley-3/3/2004
31382With news tonight is Robinson actually going to pull it off and make LGND a winnArthur Radley-3/1/2004
31381Todays action in LGND looks like a breakout to me - mainly because of the high rIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-2/11/2004
31380OxyContin lost patent protection on Monday > Link:http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/Qualified Opinion-1/10/2004
31379From Briefing: >>8:39AM LGND estimates cut at First Albany 15.30: While Ftuck-1/9/2004
31378Even if it was "better" it would not take any market share away from AIcebrg-1/8/2004
31377Anybody know how Elan's new pain drug differs from Ligand's? Is it betteMudcat-1/8/2004
31376<i>If I had invested in Robinson promises instead of LGND shares, I would nigel bates-12/22/2003
31375I'm not going to defend Robinson at all. But this dog may finally be ready Michael Young-12/19/2003
31374Forget Robinson!!! Tom, this is the same guy that has kept LGND from reaching thArthur Radley-12/19/2003
31373forget Robinson. LGND now has a good-looking chart along with some real revenuetom r. phillips-12/19/2003
31372If I had invested in Robinson promises instead of LGND shares, I would be a zillArthur Radley-12/19/2003
31371hi everybody, i haven't been on SI for over 3-4 years now and im wonderingbob smith-12/18/2003
31370>>trustworthiness and dependability?>> Yes, those are missing. And Icebrg-12/17/2003
31369Erik -- what's the trouble? you have a hangup re. trustworthiness and depentom r. phillips-12/17/2003
31368Tuck Sorry, no opinion. I have disengaged myself from Ligand. For a couple of rIcebrg-12/17/2003
31367Erik, Wondering if Ligand's dual PPAR (alpha and gamma) agonist, licensed ttuck-12/17/2003
31366Henry is in the private sector, and he may feel it inappropriate to comment on ptuck-12/8/2003
31365But where is Henry now?Howard S.-12/8/2003
31364Tuck, I put some LGND shares in my daughter's account when she was in high sArthur Radley-12/8/2003
31363Is it just me, or is ONTAK doing better clinically & financially then we thotuck-12/8/2003
31362Ligand's ONTAK Shows Potential to Treat Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Non-HoIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/8/2003
31361LGND misses by three cents on light revenues, but guides '04 higher: >&gtuck-10/31/2003
31360If interested in an FBR report, please PM. thanks.mopgcw-10/22/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News