SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Ligand (LGND) Breakout!
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
32384 154 0 LGND
Emcee:  Henry Niman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
31509Believe me, you guys are not alone. After the Elan debacle, my only saving gracFiloF-3/22/2005
31508What I hope I can take from that is that we haven't yet reached the 456 eventom pope-3/22/2005
31507I would think a PR would be forthcoming when study is unblinded saying the studyRobohogs-3/22/2005
31506You mean after the eighteen months? I'd like to think that it means that surtom pope-3/22/2005
31505Geez, I'm in here too. The Elan 3 Stooges, Larry, Moe, and Curly. I'llfred hayes-3/22/2005
31504How do you read no press release on end of study? I am very weakly long in hereRobohogs-3/21/2005
31503FWIW, Garren has an interesting idea - a way to play the success of Targretin istom pope-3/21/2005
31502I'm sure lawsuits will be announced, and probably deserved. This managementMichael Young-3/21/2005
31501Anyone think lawsuits will be announced this week? I suspect so, and it might ptuck-3/21/2005
31500I think it is more likely he was actively involved in the games.Michael Young-3/18/2005
31499It certainly appears that we have here a CEO who was paying zero attention to thtom pope-3/18/2005
31498Whatever the outcome, there always seems to be something negative going on eith FiloF-3/18/2005
31497Ligand says restatement of earnings is possible It fails to submit financial rsim1-3/18/2005
31496I hope so Bob, I did buy in the initial panic but sold at 7.83. Will probably tatom pope-3/17/2005
31495not in it now but isn't this simply sarbanes-oxley deadline? lots pf cos. arbob zagorin-3/17/2005
31494Anybody know if this causes an event of default on debt for non-filing? JonRobohogs-3/17/2005
31493Here's the whole thing, worth reading. Some good stuff, some bad stuff. SANtom pope-3/17/2005
3149210K problem - will not be ready by March 31 either. Interesting. Funny if somehRobohogs-3/17/2005
31491Good luck longs - I also never figured out how to get in (via the options high vRobohogs-3/17/2005
31490Good luck all longs. (Fortuitously, I'm out, as it never got quite low enounigel bates-3/17/2005
31489If memory serves, the critical date was to be the <i>later</i> of 45tom pope-3/16/2005
31488i think it is probably that their trial has been completed. not sure how much insammaster-3/16/2005
31487I can't think of one good reason to have a release like this. Regardless ofkenhott-3/16/2005
31486<<<With no color in this PR whatsoever, my initial bet is against good rkrw-3/16/2005
31485Tuck, Strangest PR I think I've ever seen...no mention of what the CC is allArthur Radley-3/16/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News