CLTR COULTER PHARMACEUTICAL | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
CLTR COULTER PHARMACEUTICAL

An SI Board Since January 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
666	17	0	CLTR

Emcee: HARRY GIBSON	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
316	News: Wednesday September 15, 2:53 pm Eastern Time UK's Cobra Therap to pr	DENNIS TULLY	-	9/15/1999
315	David, <<this won't make the FDA any easier on anyone>> Exact	biowa	-	9/10/1999
314	Thought this FDA experience was worth posting here, this won't make the FDA	LLCF	-	9/9/1999
313	zMy understanding is that it was agreed to beforehand. Then again the FDA can	Vector1	-	9/8/1999
312	< In additon I think it will be hard for the FDA to limit the label to trans	LLCF	-	9/8/1999
311	Gordon, Both. I don't think it will matter much. Sales will be driven by	Vector1	-	9/8/1999
310	V1, Agreed on all points, nice to see that you're not concerned about the	Gordon James	-	9/8/1999
309	I think it is human nature for people to look at the past track record of a com	synchro	-	9/7/1999
308	Gordon, I am not particularly concerned with the CLTR label although the stock	Vector1	-	9/6/1999
307	Revisiting something in an earlier post, perhaps to invite some discussion and	Gordon James	-	9/6/1999
306	DAK, From what I've seen regarding the nature of the remaining FDA issues	Gordon James	-	9/6/1999
305	V1, PB - thanks, glad you liked. PB - "professionals" - LOL - just l	Gordon James	-	9/6/1999
304	Very nice post. I already linked it to the Yahoo! board upon request for comme	Pseudo Biologist	-	9/4/1999
303	<I believe that CLTR management was blindsided.> Which would make this o	LLCF	-	9/4/1999
302	Gordon, Great post. For what its worth I believe that CLTR management was blind	Vector1	-	9/4/1999
301	<i>Another article slanted against CLTR.</i> Quite a broadside fro	Gordon James	-	9/3/1999
300	ragingbull.com Medical misconception Biowatch 09/02/99	Edscharp	-	9/2/1999
299	Another article slanted against CLTR. The article states that there are 5 anal	David Cathcart	-	9/2/1999
298	airpower.maxwell.af.mil	Ben Wa	-	9/1/1999
297	Peter, One might suggest to HTM that he might feel more at home on the free pu	Gordon James	-	9/1/1999
296	Hey - do I detect the same sardonic style as our old friend David S. (from the	Biomaven	-	9/1/1999
295	Bugs Bunny says, "uhhh...what's up doc? " not coulter! Tweety B	Ben Wa	-	9/1/1999
294	The response rates to Bexxar are just great. If the data from initial trials ho	Bharat H. Barai	-	9/1/1999
293	CLTR--let me state for the record that Jesse Eisinger is a He not a She and I a	kendall harmon	-	8/31/1999
292	Dr. Barai, Thanks for the most informative post. Interesting comment on Gemcita	Vector1	-	8/31/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):