SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1141 14 0
Emcee:  jjayxxxx Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
316To the Board: I don't know what gave someone(s) the impression that this boSI Dave-12/11/2006
315<i>I have encountered him on Raging Bull where he went by the name of FactdougSF30-12/11/2006
314Elmer, that's not correct. Other than the SI board, I have not had multiple dougSF30-12/10/2006
313Well, some people like to post a lot. I have used only one id ever. And is the sSarmad Y. Hermiz-12/10/2006
312I thought that the parting shot of renaming my alias from dougSF30 to _mas or madougSF30-12/10/2006
311I know. And , honestly, this is sincere. I remember that a new id replied to a pSarmad Y. Hermiz-12/10/2006
310Aside from the annoyance factor, I like to post on the AMD thread because I wantSarmad Y. Hermiz-12/10/2006
309well, I did make another account on SI once, having been allowed to be banned bydougSF30-12/10/2006
308I don't kinow why people here accuse others of using multiple ids. On Yahoo Sarmad Y. Hermiz-12/10/2006
307Sarmad, Economaniac is a pompous academic ass. He writes in superlatives and thElmer Phud-12/10/2006
306There's a sizable portion of posters who are AMD "fans", not invesdougSF30-12/10/2006
305To be fair, Elmer did not get banned for "apologizing", but for insultdougSF30-12/10/2006
304Our presence is not highly valued like his. For instance, can you explain how AMSarmad Y. Hermiz-12/10/2006
303Economaniac has been allowed to insult with impunity. I don't think this is Elmer Phud-12/10/2006
302delusional should be. But peanut gallery, no. Permanent ban is OK, too. The circSarmad Y. Hermiz-12/10/2006
301Calling people "delusional" and part of a "peanut gallery" aFJB-12/10/2006
300>> Should it e.g. cover: 'that post is stupid', and 'you are bSarmad Y. Hermiz-12/10/2006
299Rink, >> I think you also noticed that when Doug changed the tone in hisSarmad Y. Hermiz-12/10/2006
298I personally think trying to define levels of insults is making it far too diffijjayxxxx-12/10/2006
297Have to hit the sack. My basic idea has been to handle this the same way as the Rink-12/10/2006
296Yep.Rink-12/10/2006
295re: <i>provided all other moderated related comments from others would endjjayxxxx-12/10/2006
294LOL! + Good idea. I actually wouldn't mind that, provided all other moderateRink-12/10/2006
293I guess I am changing my mind on your call for short-term suspension powers, andjjayxxxx-12/10/2006
292Sarmad, I was indeed kind for Economaniack based on the fact he might not have bRink-12/10/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News