SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Liteglow (LTGL)
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4715 15 0 LTGL
Emcee:  Countryboy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3165 Its great to see that most of the posts are trying to support or discredit verbDJ Byrne-9/18/1998
3164 Good morning #246810 - Does that mean you bought into LTGL expecting that they Mr. Jens Tingleff-9/18/1998
3163 <i>As I have not seen proof otherwise, I still believe that the company i246810-9/18/1998
3162 What difference does it make if one or several ask SEC to investigate - IMO nonMr. Jens Tingleff-9/18/1998
3161 Please point out the difference from any other non filing OTC penny stock. Kr JMr. Jens Tingleff-9/18/1998
3160 Mr Jens Here is a link to the last years worth of LTGL PR's I believe you Shadow-9/18/1998
3159 LOL, yup - Just change the date. :-) My mother always used to say "It takMr. Jens Tingleff-9/18/1998
3158 I appreciate the thoughtful posts of those who are looking realistically at LTG246810-9/18/1998
3157 I can handle negative comments about any company. I find it hard to stomach nePhilip Bosco-9/17/1998
3156 Capt Dan, To be honest it is surprising that the stock has not dropped down tEric G. Erpenbeck-9/17/1998
3155 <i>Do you deny my right to post negative views.</i> Who the hell chickenLIPS-9/17/1998
3154 Nothing wrong with a negitive view, but over and over and over again? your reviM, Anderson-9/17/1998
3153 Do you deny my right to post negative views. I believe this stock is a black hoShadow-9/17/1998
3152 So....exactly why do you post here? You are supposedly out........you have no chickenLIPS-9/17/1998
3151 Capt: You are right Shadow and numbers are entitled to their opinions. RegardSLOJET-9/17/1998
3150 CAPT DAN these thread's are all the same, and the one thing that gets toslyfoxhunter-9/17/1998
3149 Sly, You will gain nothing from name calling. All are entitled to their opiniCAPT.DAN-9/17/1998
3148 Its not an argument, its a desperate refusal to face reality. Shadow-9/17/1998
3147 Oxymoronic responses reveal the weakness of your arguments. 246810-9/17/1998
3146 246810 you are about 12 short of a dozen, ha ha ha ha slyfoxhunter-9/17/1998
3145 Mr. Number, To clear the air about my "FACTS" as you put it. "CAPT.DAN-9/17/1998
3144 "<I> If we had a company here that didn't have record profits an246810-9/17/1998
3143 And since he lies about dilution, why do you believe him about China. And, sinc246810-9/17/1998
3142 How dare you say I am talking out of my blow hole, when you base your whole arg246810-9/17/1998
3141 Shadow If we had a company here that didn't have record profits and new acslyfoxhunter-9/16/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):