SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Ligand (LGND) Breakout!
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
32384 154 0 LGND
Emcee:  Henry Niman Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
31709The trial is done. Everything you said here is already known and documented. Tdavid nordic-5/17/2005
31708Most intriguing is the large difference in mortality between the high triglyceriBiomaven-5/17/2005
31707"Death spiral" ? I believe you have overstated . For what reason is SPSEIFERT-5/17/2005
31706Now with the Pfizer 3% and Wyeth 3% coming on stream in 2006, Ligand can be profbiostruggle-5/17/2005
31705<i>Previous Phase II data with targretin had it giving an overall 40% respClarksterh-5/17/2005
31704Remember these are phase ii data. Previous Phase II data with targretin had it biostruggle-5/17/2005
31703Avinza TRx up to 15,075 for latest week ending 5/6/05. This is highest level evRobohogs-5/17/2005
31702Cancer drugs that work on 1/3 of the patient group are not small subsets. Targredavid nordic-5/17/2005
31701Very pathetic attempt at subgroup analysis. Yet another example of not taking aMichael Young-5/16/2005
31700<i>exciting data...</i> ?? To whom ? ?? <i>..."While wenigel bates-5/16/2005
31699In spite of Ligand double talk, Targretin is total bust in NLSC. biz.yahoo.combiostruggle-5/16/2005
31698This news was released Monday May 9 but it did not show up under the lgnde newsdavid nordic-5/12/2005
31697Oporia - SERM PFE/LGNDE Name changed from Lasofoxifene to Oporia Pfizer drug tdavid nordic-5/12/2005
31696Robinson assumed price would not be a factor when he gave revenue est. DR has david nordic-5/10/2005
31695Thanks, hang in their. How does anybody justify having 900+ reps running aroundbiostruggle-5/10/2005
31694<i>The SIL board is about.... The truth. I do not need to feel warm and funigel bates-5/10/2005
31693David, You must have missed that I did not address you. For some reason you inHarold Engstrom-5/10/2005
31692"Jon, thanks for the script data." That is where I stop. There is a rdavid nordic-5/10/2005
31691Jon, thanks for the script data. I think the avg $/script you are using is probHarold Engstrom-5/10/2005
31690Keep posting Jon, please. If David can come up with a better indicator he shouldtom pope-5/10/2005
31689Filo you are wrong. I use to think that IMS data in predicting Avinza was helpfudavid nordic-5/10/2005
31688So IMS data is useless. There is no point to reporting this data. It is meaningldavid nordic-5/10/2005
31687The point is that until the earnings restatement is published with the SOX rulesdavid nordic-5/10/2005
31686Thanks for this and all of your efforts, Jon. Most here appreciate it. Don'FiloF-5/10/2005
31685Are you possibly criticizing me for trying to do a service and post this scrip iRobohogs-5/10/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):