SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
RF Micro Devices (RFMD)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4849 165 0 RFMD
Emcee:  Thomas F. Ramero Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3174Quite right A.L. But, if I may, I'd humbly suggest you add an item to your Ellen-7/25/2000
3173TRW's selling of RFMD shares doesn't appear to be anything other than toEllen-7/24/2000
3172Has anyone following RFMD got an opinion about insider selling? I am a little scpabobp-7/24/2000
3171Stupid generalizations and market overreactions create opportunities. Maybe DennA.L. Reagan-7/24/2000
3170thans for the post Ellen. Very interesting news about Solly. Not surprising.dennis michael patterson-7/24/2000
3169thestreet.com An excerpt: Jonathan Joseph, a Salomon Smith Barney analyst, knoEllen-7/24/2000
3168It reads like an analyst's report. The content seems right to me!dennis michael patterson-7/23/2000
3167Here's the CSFB earning technical report on RFMD: ________________ RF MicroSJS-7/23/2000
3166To tell you the truth Dennis...I'm not sure...but this is where I copied it MasonS-7/23/2000
3165Nice find Mason, Jack eomJack Hartmann-7/23/2000
3164Here's a nasty chip story: ebnews.com I AGREE with the observation that RFdennis michael patterson-7/23/2000
3163Another good post... RFMD-Not Just Another Chip or Wireless RFMD’s stock pricMasonS-7/23/2000
3162RFMD Q1 conference call notes 7/18/2000 - Quarterly Sales 98.2M, up 15.8% sequenJack Hartmann-7/23/2000
3161What is amazing to me is that people piled into the stock just as the technicalsdennis michael patterson-7/23/2000
3160Borrowed from a poster on Raging Bull...a long read but certainly worth the effoMasonS-7/23/2000
3159If 67 fails to hold, 55 is likely followed by mid 40's. Actually RFMD looks neverenough-7/23/2000
3158In a piece in the options column of Barrons this week, a guy mentions RFMD as hidennis michael patterson-7/23/2000
3157IMO, 67 is possible if weakness continues in the naz early next week, I would beneverenough-7/22/2000
3156I can recall each of the past several summers when the quality high tech stocks virtualinvestor-7/22/2000
3155You two have peaked my interest about that CSFB target. Time to roll up my sleevvirtualinvestor-7/22/2000
3154If you look back on the chart, that was the support level Nov. 99 - Jan. 00. MorEllen-7/22/2000
3153Agree w. you pass pass that trashing RFMD due to ERICY results makes no sense - A.L. Reagan-7/22/2000
3152Don't ask me where, but I read the same headline about CSFB target $160, tooThomas Haegin-7/22/2000
3151I’m very embarrassed and I apologize to you Ms Mason. I should not have assumed virtualinvestor-7/22/2000
3150I received an alert from Schwab at 5:30pm Friday...sorry I'm not able to cutMasonS-7/22/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News