SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
coastal caribbean (cco@)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4686 30 0 COCBE
Emcee:  jacob deutschmann Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3186Back from my six week hiatus to of all places Florida. I only got as far as DaytEdwin S. Fujinaka-12/2/2001
3185I was told there were three dates given at the trial, and this was the only one Rob Skaff-12/1/2001
3184Another thought. Why has this issue evolved into a "taking" case overocerg-11/30/2001
3183Perhaps the court recognizes that the State of Florida can't possibly pay jugeorge wood-11/30/2001
3182The @#%&%$#@ wait for the trial is horseshit! Although I know not to expectMichaelLSharp-11/29/2001
3181I couldnt agree more. Its all Bullshit about "protecting" the enviromeandy harrison-11/29/2001
3180The highly respected and skilled attorneys (HRASA) got us a two week trial 10 moocerg-11/29/2001
3179Isn't the difference that now they have highly respected and skilled attorneHoward C.-11/29/2001
3178If I recall correctly the Supreme Court refused to hear Coastal's phosphate ocerg-11/29/2001
3177I am sorry I got irrational...However, when I saw the court date, I hit the floowill3-11/28/2001
3176Will, I don't blame you for being upset. I know what !&@#%&*!@#%$!*ocerg-11/28/2001
3175Supreme Court I would guess. The Supremes have been good to land owners and haviandy harrison-11/28/2001
3174Well, I have to say that my first thought was that the judge gave them all of thwill3-11/28/2001
3173And what if the judge decides that there was no "taking" after a two wocerg-11/28/2001
3172that's a great theory, but we have been told this during other elections. IRob Skaff-11/28/2001
3171Another thought---its all Politics There is a governor's election in Early andy harrison-11/28/2001
3170i didnt take the nearly 10 month in the future trial date as such a bad thing. Iandy harrison-11/28/2001
3169What the !&@#%&*!@#%$!*? The trial is going to start Sept. 30, 2002? Is will3-11/27/2001
3168Thanks, I guess that answers my question.ocerg-11/27/2001
3167Trial date has been set!! biz.yahoo.comoelfuerunsalle-11/27/2001
3166What is the thinking on this board? Will the judge issue a statement soon that tocerg-11/26/2001
3165In todays Sarasota Herald Tribune: FREDERICK R. STROBEL: Guest Column Imported george wood-11/25/2001
3164I think the reason that the board is so quiet is that everyone has said everythiwill3-11/25/2001
3163Well, pretty quiet here on the board. Pre-trial case management conference set MichaelLSharp-11/25/2001
3162O.T. What do all you fine Libertarians here think of this analysis of W: Now, Howard C.-11/20/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News