SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Ligand (LGND) Breakout!
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
32384 154 0 LGND
Emcee:  Henry Niman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
32134Data on 2 yr carcinogenecity study was to be release 3 months ago. Silence onlybiostruggle-10/19/2005
32133Well, given that it wasn't approved outright, one could argue that Ligand matuck-10/19/2005
32132Ligands pipeline falls further behind. MRK-BMY PPAR approved with additional sabiostruggle-10/18/2005
32131Collective holding of breathe? C'mon posters! Let rip! You know what's rmetabollox-10/18/2005
32130Deleted - Duplicate.(?!)sim1-10/14/2005
32129Shareholder presses for Ligand action Hedge fund sues over overdue annual meetisim1-10/14/2005
32128Stocks on the Pink Sheets tend to rise. Investors can not see the ask/bid. I thodavid nordic-10/14/2005
32127Another shareholder suit using Sarbane-Oxley to get DM and the board banished. biostruggle-10/13/2005
32126I think there's more to come - on the science side that is!metabollox-10/13/2005
32125It just keeps getting better. Got to go get popcorn. Not my typical bios. More ldavid nordic-10/13/2005
32124It is my understanding that both buildings are leased, as indeed are many piecesmetabollox-10/13/2005
32123There is only one man that has David Robinson on the run. This one man is workindavid nordic-10/12/2005
32122Ligand building was sold last month. How would you know if this is true? If youdavid nordic-10/12/2005
32121What do you mean vis a vis the VP of science dept. and I wonder to whom do you ametabollox-10/12/2005
32120Much higher? Unless you own/control shed loads how does the miniscule fluctuatiometabollox-10/12/2005
32119Not once did I have a problem when a drug failed to meet the endpoints that is tdavid nordic-10/12/2005
32118So far the stock traded much higher. Real shareholder value if you use $$$$ as adavid nordic-10/12/2005
32117Well, based on the buys listed in Schedules A and B of the 13D, he is already maFiloF-10/12/2005
32116How will Loeb make money off Ligand? Will his actions drive the share price upcoyne-10/12/2005
32115He comes in and tears apart poorly run companies and hightails out with his profbiostruggle-10/12/2005
32114Does this guy represent someone internal or is he only a MM?david nordic-10/12/2005
32113Loeb files litigation to force annual shareholder meeting and so current managembiostruggle-10/12/2005
32112New 13D filed by Loeb et al. Complaint is attached. Ownership by Management CoFiloF-10/12/2005
32111Robinson letter to Loeb - October 11 October 11, 2005 Daniel S. Loeb Chief Exmetabollox-10/11/2005
32110MONDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2005 THE TRADER By MICHAEL SANTOLI Barrons &lDoc Bones-10/8/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News