SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
322 Wade, Check out the intraday trading charts for the last ten days for NANO at Douglas V. Fant-3/6/1997
321 Patrick, Based on your information ..isn't it obvious that NANO is sufferinWade-3/6/1997
320 Doug, Thanks. That is an excellent summary. Just hope NANO is on the list thougWade-3/6/1997
319 Patrick and Wade, If you guys have the time, read Schwab's daily briefing Douglas V. Fant-3/5/1997
318 Wade: So tell me, sir what you make of it all...RSI trending up,stochastics trpatrick ertel-3/5/1997
317 Hi Patrick, I remenbered an interview with John Murphy on CNBC about 1 or 2 yeaWade-3/5/1997
316 Wade: I like the MACD. My graphing software has histograms, and when the bars patrick ertel-3/5/1997
315 Patrick, NANO was on my radar screen for several months before my first buy lasWade-3/4/1997
314 Wade: You're right. It does look like cup and handle. I confess that I donpatrick ertel-3/4/1997
313 Hi Patrick, Excellent fundamental analysis. Here is my 2 cents for the chart anWade-3/3/1997
312 Mr. Bernhardt: You are quite right to be to be discriminating in your analysispatrick ertel-3/3/1997
311 Wade, Thanks. See my other post of two minutes ago on the Semitool Thread. I vDouglas V. Fant-3/3/1997
310 Goug, I second. We bet on it. WadeWade-3/3/1997
309 Byron, Agreed. Many semi equip companies showed revenue declines for the perioDouglas V. Fant-3/2/1997
308 Peter, You're correct that NANO did not show much revenue growth from Q3 96Byron Angel-3/2/1997
307 Patrick, Thanks for posting the link to the Infrastructure article. These colPeter Bernhardt-3/2/1997
306 Wade and Patrick, Agreed. Wall Street will only "notice" this stock Douglas V. Fant-3/1/1997
305 Hi Patrick, Thanks. It is an excellent article. I am glad to find another belieWade-3/1/1997
304 Gentlemen: What we have here is a real gem in the rough! By every measure, modpatrick ertel-3/1/1997
303 Byron, One other article lending support to you: See "www.techweb.com/inDouglas V. Fant-2/26/1997
302 Byron, Thanks. I am fully invested in individual equipment stocks and not budgDouglas V. Fant-2/26/1997
301 Doug, Regarding your comment on the importance of 2nd quarter earnings during tByron Angel-2/26/1997
300 Tim, Don't panic yet! Check out Post #187 on Electroglas. EGLS noted that Douglas V. Fant-2/26/1997
299 Doug,I own HLIT and BAY and I think I got hit by a Tsumani. I think the big oneTimothy Tashjian-2/26/1997
298 Wade, Agreed. I follow fundamentals more than technical factors, but still genDouglas V. Fant-2/26/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News