SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Computer Associates
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5232 59 0 CA
Emcee:  Everard Taylor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3232 I was right...about the huge selling into yesterday's move up. Today prettBox-By-The-Riviera™-3/30/1999
3231 well....we can't argue with Moody's can we? 'THEY' have spoken.DEER HUNTER-3/30/1999
3230 hmmmm.....they could sell sanjay? or cut off wangs right foot....that's prBox-By-The-Riviera™-3/30/1999
3229 I'll throw my two bits in.... I still have a bit of CA that I'm going tDavid Mullins-3/30/1999
3228 their debt load stinks this time around in a big way along with their debt ratiBox-By-The-Riviera™-3/30/1999
3227 the CA story? uhhh...let's see.....work work work work work! Get in early .DEER HUNTER-3/30/1999
3226 stock will probably go up......but the taste of this one is just as ugly as cscBox-By-The-Riviera™-3/30/1999
3225 geeezzzz....and I was gonna say......40 dollars. I've said it before and I&DEER HUNTER-3/30/1999
3224 <i>PRUDENTIAL SETS COMPUTER ASSOCIATES 12-MONTH PRICE TARGET AT $40/SHR jas cooper-3/30/1999
3223 Mike, I think that a PLAT limit order @24 could be filled tomorrow. For whMarq Spencer-3/29/1999
3222 You read my mind Doughboy. I thought the same thing. I've looked at takinMike 2.0-3/29/1999
3221 Doughboy, I was thinking the same. Not sure why the arbs are keeping the pMarq Spencer-3/29/1999
3220 Doughboy, Chuck comes out looking good, I guess, even though the people whoMarq Spencer-3/29/1999
3219 Is it curious to you that PLAT is still $5 below the CA tender? The spread is Doughboy-3/29/1999
3218 No problem. BTW I looked at PLAT's earnings est's on Stocksite.com (viMike 2.0-3/29/1999
3217 Phillips went to "neutral" around March 11. He moves CA and CPWR.wfw William F. Wager, Jr.-3/29/1999
3216 Thanks for confirming my shaky memory. I don't understand how an analyst (Doughboy-3/29/1999
3215 Summary of deal, including a couple of analyst comments, from Bloomberg.com. &Doughboy-3/29/1999
3214 Yes he is indeed the same analyst. So if he is jumping back on board CA that cMike 2.0-3/29/1999
3213 Isn't he the same analyst that made the call a few weeks ago that took CA dDoughboy-3/29/1999
3212 Chuck Phillips of MSDW did go from "neutral" to "strong buy"William F. Wager, Jr.-3/29/1999
3211 I listened to the conference call. Unfortunately, the number they put in the pDoughboy-3/29/1999
3210 <i>Double</i> Upgrade by Morgan Stanley. Headline from Yahoo: MonDoughboy-3/29/1999
3209 The trading sizes look pretty horrific IMO. Someone is selling into this in a Box-By-The-Riviera™-3/29/1999
3208 DH, Up above $37!! Should be smooth sailing over the near term as the clouMarq Spencer-3/29/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):