SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI Grammar and Spelling Lab
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
4715 68 0
Emcee:  jbe Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3236 You're certainly on my list for the best reference sources. Also for the qThe Philosopher-7/24/1999
3235 <i>As a sophisticated user of the language, do you strive to make your wrThe Philosopher-7/24/1999
3234 Gee, I'm getting paranoid...Am I on anyone's list(s)? Did I make it?? jbe-7/24/1999
3233 Three questions and a comment: As a sophisticated user of the language, do youDayuhan-7/24/1999
3232 Just think about it, E. If 'deputise' means to turn someone into a depuAchilles-7/24/1999
3231 I have the 20 volume OED, 2nd Edition, which incorporates the 13 volume 1st ediThe Philosopher-7/24/1999
3230 Christopher, my 13 vol. OED gives <i>expertize</i> as a verb; but nE-7/24/1999
3229 Didn't need to look far. OED. Expertize, v. intr. To act as an expert. The Philosopher-7/24/1999
3228 I'm guessing that this neologism does not mean 'to turn into an expert&Achilles-7/24/1999
3227 Keep that away from Christopher, he might find a precedent. Dayuhan-7/24/1999
3226 In the NYT Magazine last Sunday, there was an article about a series of art foE-7/24/1999
3225 I'll get back to you on this, okay? I have more to say, actually. E-7/23/1999
3224 Deleted. You're welcome.The Philosopher-7/23/1999
3223 Or perhaps cross between petulant and redundant.Achilles-7/23/1999
3222 Love it, E! "Industry Pundant." Cross between pungent and pedant?jbe-7/23/1999
3221 I'm WAY behind on this thread, but have to drop in on the conversation lonE-7/23/1999
3220 I have not checked out all postings yet to this thread so someone else may haveEdwarda-7/22/1999
3219 There is almost always an easy way out. Your sentence: <i> If a reporterDayuhan-7/22/1999
3218 <i>Christopher, I would use "he" in the case of your "a reThe Philosopher-7/22/1999
3217 Christopher, I would use "he" in the case of your "a reporter&qujbe-7/22/1999
3216 You didn't tell me what construction you prefer to avoid the he/she, his/heThe Philosopher-7/22/1999
3215 "....this is another older usage temporarily mislaid and now being rediscojbe-7/22/1999
3214 On imply and infer, Webster's Third International broke the dam. I don'The Philosopher-7/22/1999
3213 >I can't see anybody who strives for a clear, effective, prose style isAchilles-7/22/1999
3212 The most common usage on SI is something like "I tried to dialogue with hiDayuhan-7/22/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):