SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
American International Industries Inc. OTC BB Symbol EDII
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4814 9 0 EDII
Emcee:  ColinD Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3239 I was just looking at 10-SB disclosures. I came across a random 10-SB off the Ejhild-10/24/1998
3238 Carlie: Thank you for your articulate response. I am sure your intellect is ojmt-10/24/1998
3237 Thanks for your kind comments, but really, the story is so compelling here, I tjhild-10/24/1998
3236 Jhild, You should also go with JMT and Janice. Carlie L Vickers-10/24/1998
3235 Then Please go and search back to 500BC and take little miss janice with you..Carlie L Vickers-10/24/1998
3234 Ruskin: <i>One last one, and then I'm really resting!</i> I wjmt-10/22/1998
3233 <i>...and he says he clearly does not remember getting a message that a sJanice Shell-10/22/1998
3232 wireless Can't you tell by the substance of it's post's that it Gerald F Bunch-10/22/1998
3231 Ruskin I own a home. It is appraised at 76500(that is by the local aprasial diGerald F Bunch-10/22/1998
3230 mitch: I stunned: we finally agree on something. However I would, FWIW, adviswonk-10/22/1998
3229 Ruskin: Well auditor, you really shot yourself in the foot on this one. <wonk-10/21/1998
3228 Ruskin: So, you want a "smoking gun." Well this one is not about lawonk-10/21/1998
3227 Ruskin: Gosh, I'm impressed! <i> I was a former senior auditor for wonk-10/21/1998
3226 Sorry Ruskin, have to agree with jmt, for the most part, really lame. <i&gwonk-10/21/1998
3225 Jhild, I have to agree with you on one certain point that bring to the picturBigDaddyMac-10/21/1998
3224 <i> from day 1 of signing on..</i> Freudian Slip Alert. So jjhild-10/21/1998
3223 <i> The company cannot overvaluate it. </i> Mr. Magna C. Laudjhild-10/21/1998
3222 One last one, and then I'm really resting! Jhild writes, "Well the coRuskin-10/21/1998
3221 Jhild, in your last post, you accuse the company of a breach of ethics, yet youRuskin-10/21/1998
3220 <I>What does this have to do with our discussion concerning Dror's stMoneyBaggs-10/21/1998
3219 Moneybaggs posts: "Can't show you that because no one has stated thatRuskin-10/21/1998
3218 Jhild, I'm glad you are so concerned with a potential EDII over valuation oRuskin-10/21/1998
3217 jmt, you have convinced me, you're wacky. Here we go...though this will bRuskin-10/21/1998
3216 My, your defense of Dror is very Clintonesque in its construction. I suppose thjhild-10/21/1998
3215 <I>I would like an example of a post in which someone says, "Dror toMoneyBaggs-10/21/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):