SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
SNRS- Sunrise Technologies
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4140 25 0 SNRS
Emcee:  WILLIAM BLACK Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3240 <i>you will see that it was not his trading skills that I was criticizinglindend-10/28/1999
3239 Brucie, 1. You issued me a very arrogantly worded challenge with a $10,000 betPluvia-10/28/1999
3238 RWReeves: Good post. "Effluvia", I like that. And accurate. Just gBruce L-10/28/1999
3237 RW Boring Boy... <i> Maybe you were busy losing your shirts on CLPA. <Pluvia-10/28/1999
3236 Effluvia, give it up. This the best you can do? I've had worse days on SNRRWReeves-10/28/1999
3235 PLU,Jay,Auric,Anthony and other pros I would like to thank you guys for sharingtool dude-10/27/1999
3234 'fluv, why even talk to me? In your eyes I'm just another source of cRWReeves-10/27/1999
3233 Mr Pluvia: The tone of your last post was civil and adult. I, for one, welcomeBruce L-10/27/1999
3232 Linden deCarmo, Thank you for the following response you made to one of the lePluvia-10/27/1999
3231 <<You'd better do some reading on the short threads before you criticBruce L-10/27/1999
3230 SNRS is still at the top of the overinflated list: search.tscn.com Looks likJay Fisk-10/27/1999
3229 <i>But you weren't very confident because you entered your shorlindend-10/27/1999
3228 RW, You're the typical stubborn shareholder that won't admit you'vPluvia-10/27/1999
3227 Sorry to disabuse you 'fluv You won't hear that noise out of me. You RWReeves-10/27/1999
3226 <<In order to answer your question (about shorting tactics), you would haBruce L-10/27/1999
3225 <<If your wife knew how much money I made on this trade -she'd drop yBruce L-10/27/1999
3224 Joe- I don't know what you're talking about; my remark was a pun regarLPS5-10/27/1999
3223 Oh, no! The box is disappearing! Joe Joe-10/27/1999
3222 I think he bought 20K shares. Heck I lost more than that in a hiccup once. Joe-10/27/1999
3221 <i> Think Dr. Kelman has done mor DD in that field than anyone posting onPluvia-10/27/1999
3220 <<...you make me sick..>> But Pluvia, you still haven't answerBruce L-10/27/1999
3219 Pluvia, CM Burns, Wouldn't that be, er....shorting against "the box&qLPS5-10/27/1999
3218 <i> Would you put your eye up for a publicity stunt??? I THINK NOT... <Pluvia-10/27/1999
3217 Kelly, I have no connections. Joe Joe-10/27/1999
3216 Bruce, <i> And having just arrived on our thread, why are you so bombastPluvia-10/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):