SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intermagnetics (IMG)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3448 16 0 IMG
Emcee:  Gregg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3248 I've followed this stock for years and I don't recall any mention of suShamukE-1/12/2000
3247 Has IMG ever gotten involved with the electromagnetic heating type of crude oiJordan Electron-1/12/2000
3246 Short interest has increased in IMG to over 700,000. (from yahoo's profile Tom Linzmeier-1/12/2000
3245 The conference call is available at IMG's website igc.com . Click on conferMark Shaw-1/7/2000
3244 Shamuk, I see that there were some undelivered promises in the past. Good to geJon Khymn-1/6/2000
3243 IMG has promised and not delivered too many times. While the former "head ShamukE-1/6/2000
3242 Mark, I suppose superconduct material is not the core business of IMG? I wondeJon Khymn-1/6/2000
3241 Welcome to the thread W.M. The question you pose has baffled me and others on tMark Shaw-1/6/2000
3240 Mark, thanks for posting the conference call. I have compared IMG with AMSC, CJon Khymn-1/6/2000
3239 And so is my magnetic inductance theory: pages.prodigy.comJordan Electron-1/6/2000
3238 Mark... I have to congratulate them on earnings...far better than I had thoughtGerald Thomas-1/5/2000
3237 One more item from the conference call. An analyst asked about FRIGC and GlennMark Shaw-1/5/2000
3236 I just finished listening to the conference call. Three brokers had questions; Mark Shaw-1/5/2000
3235 Earnings are out and they look great. Restructuring charges far lower than whaWafa SHIHABI-1/5/2000
3234 Good to hear from you again, Frank. Gregg is also posting this garbage over onMark Shaw-1/5/2000
3233 It's not me, it's the facts. IMG is worth a hell of a lot more than AmeGregg-1/5/2000
3232 Don't believe Gregg's BS.... He's a dufus (see the introductory poFrank Byers-1/4/2000
3231 Greg, I've been silently following IMG for about a year due to the KryotecArtslaw-1/4/2000
3230 TAKE OFF...THIS STOCK SHOULD MOVE UP FAST. I'M LOOKING FOR $50 SOON. TAKE AGregg-1/4/2000
3229 The stock held up pretty well today given the slaughter elsewhere. It got downMark Shaw-1/4/2000
3228 Wafa, Very nice piece. TTom Linzmeier-1/4/2000
3227 Sector performance in 1999 Message 12438268Wafa SHIHABI-1/2/2000
3226 Dittos to both of you and others ... Happy new year.Gerald Thomas-12/31/1999
3225 Money is certainly moving into ISCO, CDTS and SCON. Most have doubled in the paTom Linzmeier-12/31/1999
3224 I certainly don't have the experience or expertise in the securities industMark Shaw-12/29/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):