ACT NETWORKS | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
ACT NETWORKS

An SI Board Since November 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2326	7	0	ANET

Emcee: Ellison Ting	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
326	Why don't you short it, then, if you're so positive it's going down	Chris Odom	-	4/12/1997
325	If you got this around 11, and looking down the road, the upside is much greate	TWC	-	4/12/1997
324	Money This stock fell from 48 and although it never should have gotten up ther	desert fox	-	4/12/1997
323	Let's see-if they meet est stock goes down 1, if they fall 2c short stock g	Gary Burton	-	4/12/1997
322	[Punishing Stocks] >> Market is punishing stocks for beating estimates.	barry fowler	-	4/11/1997
321	Market is punishing stocks for beating estimates. ASND, SEG, AMD, COGNF, &	Matthew Ghilarducci	-	4/11/1997
320	The key is earnings -- it must beat estimates -- meeting them is not enough. AS	Soumya De	-	4/11/1997
319	ANET seems to have a strong support around 14. It held up very well yesterday,	TWC	-	4/11/1997
318	Yes, the 8,000 shares are part of the selling that we diligently discussed in t	Andrew Q. Viet	-	4/11/1997
317	Thanks for the info, Andrew. What do you make of it? It seems to me that this	Steve Borg	-	4/11/1997
316	Thanks Chris. I'm not sure this guy is worth responding to. According to	Steve Borg	-	4/11/1997
315	I just talked to an investor relations rep at anet. She told me that the compan	Andrew Q. Viet	-	4/11/1997
314	Jing, Your bogus research caused this confusion in the first place, so don'	Chris Odom	-	4/10/1997
313	I agree with TWC -- since we have not heard anything from the company, they mus	Soumya De	-	4/10/1997
312	Anyone care to venture a guess about impact of .17 cents eps on price of this s	adolf	-	4/10/1997
311	Joe Noel is at Hambrecht and Quist.	jr	-	4/10/1997
310	One of the analysts is Joe Noel and I don't really know which firm he is af	Andrew Q. Viet	-	4/10/1997
309	To All, Do we know who the two analysts who are covering ANET are? I was wonde	Soumya De	-	4/10/1997
308	Bill, thanks for giving the Barron's link. You confirmed my point. Steve,	BBull	-	4/9/1997
307	Steve, sorry for the confusion, but thanks for the reply. The target was actua	Ed Richmond	-	4/9/1997
306	The book value of ANET is around 10. Great growth, Zacks ranks number one in ne	TWC	-	4/9/1997
305	Here is a link to the specific Barron's info being mentioned: barrons.com	Bill Marble	-	4/9/1997
304	Thank you, Luke. There is a huge difference between a cumulative total of 399K	Steve Borg	-	4/9/1997
303	I've got the current issue of Barron's. It shows 3 insiders selling 20	Skeptic	-	4/9/1997
302	I just wanted to see you support your claim. Copy/paste is a very simple opera	Steve Borg	-	4/9/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):