SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
coastal caribbean (cco@)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4686 30 0 COCBE
Emcee:  jacob deutschmann Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3261Thanks for the link to the SEC filing for the new stock offering. The Company onEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/13/2002
3260Link to the S-1 sec.govoelfuerunsalle-1/12/2002
3259I'm surprised at the "at least $1 billion" comment. This is the fiEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/12/2002
3258Remember, $1 billion for just the 224-A lease. We still have other leases that coelfuerunsalle-1/12/2002
3257Source:SEC S-1 "On November 27, 2001, the Leon County Circuit Court set aoelfuerunsalle-1/12/2002
3256I read the S-1 filing on the Bloomberg terminal (this is not bloomberg.com).oelfuerunsalle-1/12/2002
3255Why don't you post the SEC Filing if you have it? I'd be interested in aEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/11/2002
3254Did anybody read the S-1 filing, yet? CCO wants not less than $1 billion for thoelfuerunsalle-1/11/2002
3253How about the idea of either a cash infusion from CSPLF or a merger between CSPLEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/11/2002
3252The time may be ripe for a concerted PR effort to increase the visibility of CoaEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/11/2002
3251I didn't see the press release until just now. The only way that the CompanyEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/11/2002
3250What gives.. No responses to CCO's pending stock sale and executive/counsel andy harrison-1/11/2002
3249More OT Stuff on Property Rights for Malibu Beach Front Property Owners. Not reaEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/9/2002
3248OT "Taking" in one form or another seems to be in fashion these days. Edwin S. Fujinaka-1/9/2002
3247When you are up to your A$$ in alligators it is hard to remember that you came tEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/9/2002
3246Why are the Feds paying for it? Because the FEDS...specifically, the US Army CoHoward C.-1/9/2002
3245I post these off topic articles because not much is going on in our case as it wEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/8/2002
3244This case before the US Supreme Court may have a peripheral impact on our case. Edwin S. Fujinaka-1/6/2002
3243OT It looks like The Federal Government and the State Government will cooperate Edwin S. Fujinaka-1/5/2002
3242OT More reason to consider why we need to develop our domestic supplies of oil eEdwin S. Fujinaka-1/5/2002
3241OT When things are slow as they probably will continue (until around October, 20Edwin S. Fujinaka-1/5/2002
3240General discussion on opening ANWR. The same arguments can be made for opening tEdwin S. Fujinaka-12/30/2001
3239I do believe that there will be drilling some day, but do not believe we will haRob Skaff-12/30/2001
3238At the very least, we should inventory all of the likely sources of domestic oilEdwin S. Fujinaka-12/30/2001
3237I believe that Coastal Petroleum's Leases include Lake Ochechobee and other Edwin S. Fujinaka-12/29/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News