SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3602 25 0 ENE
Emcee:  Jorj X Mckie Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
327Lay-ing Low Thursday January 17, 8:35 am Eastern Time Forbes.com By Dan Ackman stockman_scott-1/17/2002
326Those who are breathing a sigh of relief that there's no sign that Bush direportage-1/17/2002
325It's too early to know for sure, but it's beginning to look like what weOriginal Mad Dog-1/17/2002
324dude, let me be the first to break it to you...something is wrong with the syst10K a day-1/17/2002
323If Ken Lay doesn't join some of the Andersen execs in prison then something&stockman_scott-1/17/2002
322kind of makes' some of the TCI (chump change) Excite at home deals...seem si10K a day-1/17/2002
321That is amazing.10K a day-1/17/2002
320Ex-Enron Employees Suggest Anderson Helped Veil Deals By MICHAEL A. HILTZIK andstockman_scott-1/17/2002
319Why do you leave the date off the articles? Again, this article is about 10 daysLabrador-1/17/2002
318Andersen to top insurance limits January 16, 2002 (Reuters) — You can only instockman_scott-1/17/2002
317Rubin Foiled the Democrats' Best-Laid Plans Bloomberg - 1/15/02 Caroline stockman_scott-1/17/2002
316For this board also: <b>Ex-Lieberman Aide Lobbied for Enron</b> By KLP-1/16/2002
315Many of the folks who make laws are lawyers...and trial lawyers....Maybe we shouKLP-1/16/2002
314I know...didn't see one...Do you have a date? The important part is to readKLP-1/16/2002
313I'm just glad my disability and life insurance carrier isn't on that lisjcky-1/16/2002
312OUCH! Actually, I think some Enron executives are going to be saying that soon.Lazarus_Long-1/16/2002
311Has Enron become 'a risky place'...? chron.comstockman_scott-1/16/2002
310It's beyond enron. The idea that they would shred documents is wrong, no matjoseph krinsky-1/16/2002
309<i>Question: are the laws so many and complicated for every business transCountofMoneyCristo-1/16/2002
308Hi Count- I agree that we need to look at the regulatory agencies. They are therjoseph krinsky-1/16/2002
307<i>I think it was the better of 2 evils for Anderson. What would get them CountofMoneyCristo-1/16/2002
306Karen, I read your post. I have read some very different reports - for instancCountofMoneyCristo-1/16/2002
305you left the date off the article. this is at least a week old.Labrador-1/16/2002
304I didn't know that, thanks for the info. I thought that they were restrictedjoseph krinsky-1/16/2002
303The New York Times on Enron. You erred all right! nytimes.com You need to regisLazarus_Long-1/16/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News