SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CYRIX / NSM
An SI Board Since December 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
33344 34 0 NSM
Emcee:  Badshah J.Wazir Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
32744 Why is this board so dead, esp. when earnings just came out? Cirruslvr-6/11/1999
32743 Oppps, I forgot.... Losing less money definitely helps. Not to mention the promJim McMannis-6/10/1999
32742 Jim: national.com NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR REPORTS LOSS OF 24 CENTS PER SHARE BL. Adam Latham-6/10/1999
32741 Wow, this stock is doing better than Intel. I guess the magic words were, "Jim McMannis-6/10/1999
32740 Link to link. post.messages.yahoo.com Schebrobert scheb-6/10/1999
32739 Is Intel gunning for chipset maker VIA? forbes.com forbes.com FJB-6/10/1999
32738 OT OT...Off Topic....IMHO-In My Humble Opinion, EOM-End Of Message(for one lineDan B.-6/10/1999
32737 Hi, I want to profess my chat room ignorance. What is IMHO, EOM, and BWDIK? Jimmy Liao-6/10/1999
32736 Jozef, maybe that's right, but I just don't recall hearing such from NSDan B.-6/10/1999
32735 Jozef, NSM's 4th qtr,FY99 ended the end of May. We're in a new qtr now.Scott Carr-6/10/1999
32734 Another information appliance in the works: theregister.co.uk <i>The fiJoe NYC-6/10/1999
32733 Dan, <i>The article doesn't give a reason for saying plans for fast Joe NYC-6/10/1999
32732 Thanks for the article. The article doesn't give a reason for saying plansDan B.-6/9/1999
32731 Here's the Forbes article: I'm not worried though. June 08, 1999 No bScott Carr-6/9/1999
32730 Scott, that link to the negative Forbes article is blank! hehehe..and Re: youDan B.-6/9/1999
32729 link to negative Forbes article: forbes.comScott Carr-6/9/1999
32728 jane-er, CRAIG, you ignorant slut. Craig,oh great one, keeper of the flame, Scott Carr-6/9/1999
32727 I thought I understood that they intend to keep substantial use of the fab(witDan B.-6/8/1999
32726 Bob, good links. I still don't know what will happen if they sell the fabJoe NYC-6/8/1999
32725 Dan B ".it's a JOLT to click on Inbox and find a link." It'robert scheb-6/8/1999
32724 Now that was an interesting article. Yeah, thanks(to Mr. Grutza too) for keepiDan B.-6/8/1999
32723 OT...If reading "the book" means that I can choose, for instance, to Dan B.-6/8/1999
32722 For those interested in the analog vs. digital VLSI debate. eet.com AnthonyAB-6/8/1999
32721 Yeah, EOMDan B.-6/8/1999
32720 Scott, Here you are chastizing people for arrogance and you then you start preSteve Porter-6/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News