SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Labor Ready (LRW)
An SI Board Since October 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
379 3 0 LRW
Emcee:  lukey Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
329 <i>I believe that we have past last years lowest price when it is adjusteMike M-9/8/1999
328 Interesting message from someone who visited an office last week...FWIW... boaoilbabe-9/8/1999
327 Jim: As we both know, markets over react both on the upside and the downside. Toilbabe-9/8/1999
326 I believe that we have past last years lowest price when it is adjusted for theJim Berg-9/7/1999
325 Mike: I think there has been a short term bottom put in. It got hit pretty hardoilbabe-9/7/1999
324 Technically I would expect it to bounce from around 10 at least one more time aMike M-9/7/1999
323 Looks like it is going to get run under $10.00, probably to trigger some stop loilbabe-9/7/1999
322 Jim, I think you are right on...It is hard to believe that a company earning inMike M-9/7/1999
321 I,m expecting you will at least double your money before April has past, tripleJim Berg-9/7/1999
320 Jim, I have two GTC buy orders in. One for 500 shares at 9.5 and 500 shares aDr. Seuss-9/6/1999
319 I think 9.5 because of the chart but 7 is possible If the company doesn't cJim Berg-9/5/1999
318 I may. I normally wouldn't invest long in a stock like LRW, but it'll bDr. Seuss-9/4/1999
317 Blame the shorts. Good one Khris, no long looking at a big loss like you ever Dr. Seuss-9/4/1999
316 <i>/Oilbabe, I'm sure that you are familiar w/ the saying that even aDr. Seuss-9/4/1999
315 Yet you really sound bothered.... Step-off, twit???? Hee Heeeee..... Dr.Dr. Seuss-9/4/1999
314 Sure, I admit a bit of luck. Hell yeah. The only reason I pull the ego out isDr. Seuss-9/4/1999
313 This is responce to your post# 299 Shorting can seem like playing with fire somJim Berg-9/4/1999
312 I have found that all stocks go down faster than up with maybe the exception ofJim Berg-9/4/1999
311 Yea, I would like to know that too, although it would almost be unfair to ask. oilbabe-9/4/1999
310 Dr. Seuss I have a question for you Are you going to take a long position hereJim Berg-9/4/1999
309 <i>did a lot of research on LRW and called this short on the nose. The paKhris Vogel-9/4/1999
308 As per usual, Mike, an excellent post.Khris Vogel-9/4/1999
307 <i>I thank goodness that I listened to the rantings of "Dr. Seuss&quKhris Vogel-9/4/1999
306 <i>Glen Welstead no doubt rues the day he hired Mr Diamond.</i> OrKhris Vogel-9/4/1999
305 Any guesses as to what I could possibly find to be more pathetic than you childKhris Vogel-9/4/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):