SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Discussion Thread
An SI Board Since May 2008
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3816 14 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3291<i>"Tax cuts were much deeper, and affected far more money, for familOeconomicus13/6/2009
3290FutureGen: Economic and Political Decisions Posted by Chris Edwards People whoTimF-3/6/2009
3289[graphic] from jammiewearingfool.blogspot.comTimF-3/6/2009
3288 Your link doesn't provide a single argument against my point. Its not eveTimF-3/6/2009
3287<i>False, overall the government shifted money from the rich to the not-ritejek-3/6/2009
3286<b>Tax Cuts Offer Most for Very Rich, Study Says</b> By EDMUND L. Atejek-3/6/2009
3285<i>I think you're confused about what "low teaser rates" meatejek-3/6/2009
3284Saving Alabama from Bingo Mises Daily by Briggs Armstrong | Posted on 1/21/2009TimF-3/6/2009
3283Rejek is ineducable...jlallen-3/6/2009
3282TigerHawk TV: Who are these "rich" people? tigerhawk.blogspot.comTimF-3/5/2009
3281Krauthammer's Take [NRO Staff] From last night's All Stars. On PresiTimF-3/5/2009
3280True, but he cut them for everyone and proportionally less for the top earners. Oeconomicus13/5/2009
3279I think you're confused about what "low teaser rates" means. That Oeconomicus-3/5/2009
3278<i>FACT: Bush's policies favored the rich." Sorry, not fact. Contejek-3/5/2009
3277<i>Selling mortgages with "low teaser rates" was a manifestationtejek-3/5/2009
3276Selling mortgages with "low teaser rates" was a manifestation of bad bOeconomicus13/5/2009
3275<i>"FACT: Bush's policies favored the rich."</i> SorrOeconomicus13/5/2009
3274<I> Bush's policies favored the rich. </i> False, overall theTimF-3/5/2009
3273 I didn't say that tax evasion was something I support, at least not in norTimF-3/5/2009
3272 What person and action do you think I'm defending? Its not clear from youTimF-3/5/2009
3271<i>Gee. You got some evidence this particular guy was behind any fraud or tejek-3/5/2009
3270<i>"What's reprehensible is that he is one of the key players behOeconomicus-3/5/2009
3269People we can't believe in...... <b>Ex-KB Home CEO Indicted For Stocktejek-3/5/2009
3268<i>A level, or even "more level" playing field is not defined bytejek-3/5/2009
3267<i>Oh, so buying delinquent mortgages and then refinancing them on easier tejek-3/5/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News