SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
XSNI - X-Stream Network
An SI Board Since May 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3519 5 0 XSNI
Emcee:  Wayne Rumball Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3294 Take a little time out and think. Your average junk BB chart looks like this _Wayne Rumball-1/8/2000
3293 You missed the best part of my thread, Wayne. Up in the header where we talk aDale Baker-1/8/2000
3292 And why is Dale concerned about $6 mark? And why did he mention it? His threaWayne Rumball-1/8/2000
3291 Glad to see the idiot Dale on the thread once again. You bet, once this stock Wayne Rumball-1/8/2000
3290 So XSNI is ready for another scalp? Just wanted to let lurkers know that if laDale Baker-1/8/2000
3289 All the naz issues are already running. The search for copy cat runners will fWayne Rumball-1/8/2000
3288 I am more positive than negative on this stock by far, but the two scenarios isVBroady-1/7/2000
3287 One would think the Management of X-stream would prefer their ISP Company to donkeyman-1/7/2000
3286 No, it doesn't. Most Americans didn't know what "shag" meantDale Baker-1/7/2000
3285 Not at all. Anyay I think that the dog should have been called Roger. RegardsJon C-1/7/2000
3284 My guess is that this is your way of telling us that we (Hoyle) are going to beGlenn Petersen-1/7/2000
3283 Glen, You asked for it bud you can have it. Had me in stitches. Regards JonJon C-1/7/2000
3282 The more odd, the better. Please post.Glenn Petersen-1/7/2000
3281 Am I allowed to post a true but VERY ODD story from Londons Evening Standard onJon C-1/7/2000
3280 The share value may not matter if they pay cash. Shells are relatively cheap. E Richter-1/7/2000
3279 I don't see how another reverse merger would add any value to the current sGlenn Petersen-1/7/2000
3278 It has been speculated that X-Stream plans to merge with a shell on the London early player-1/7/2000
3277 yes, of course. Moving to nasdaq has more stringent requirements regarding finaamadeus-1/7/2000
3276 ANOTHER EXCELLENT PRESS RELEASE FOR X-STREAM - ONE AFTER ANOTHER. The big pldonkeyman-1/7/2000
3275 Dale: I can't see how there's anything wrong with x-stream's finadonkeyman-1/7/2000
3274 Perhaps I misunderstood; you can't bypass reporting requirements by moving Dale Baker-1/7/2000
3273 ( BW)(X-STREAM-NETWORK)(XSNI) Snaz.com Announces Partnership with X-Stream Troutbum-1/7/2000
3272 agreed on both points. I guess my expectation is that consolidation will occur amadeus-1/7/2000
3271 Just visited thestream.com; the voice-over-IP partnership endeavor; this technoVBroady-1/7/2000
3270 We'll probably all be sorry in 3-4 years that we didn't put more into tVBroady-1/7/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News