SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Merck
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1580 80 0 MRK
Emcee:  Alfred W. Post Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
330 Rich: re PFE valuation. Thanks for the Jubak's computation. Not sure i buyJim Garrison-8/26/1997
329 Jim, Here's how Jubak did his calculation estimated 12 month eps = $1.87 Rich Goldsmith-8/25/1997
328 sheila, for me, since part of investing and/or trading is psychological, perhaEepOpp-8/25/1997
327 Jim-Thanks! In what seems like hundreds of hours roaming about SI threads, thidper-8/24/1997
326 Jim, Thank you for that in depth comparison of Merck and Pfizer. I'm printisheila rothstein-8/24/1997
325 Rich: Thanks for your input. As i indicated i don't follow pfe and I apprecJim Garrison-8/24/1997
324 Go with MRK! In case you haven't been following the PFE thread, here'sRich Goldsmith-8/24/1997
323 Sheila: <Could you give me some good reasons why I should hold on to MRK ratJim Garrison-8/24/1997
322 Hi Jim, I have owned Merck shares for about 5 months,. Compared to Warner Lambesheila rothstein-8/23/1997
321 To all from Infobeat financial e-mail report: * Prilosec climbed to the head ofJim Garrison-8/23/1997
320 I am also very positive about Merck for LT and ST. RuilinRUILIN ZHAO-8/23/1997
319 To all: John Murphy (technical guru on CNBC) indicating that Merck has held supJim Garrison-8/20/1997
318 Jim: You're entitled to your opinion - i don't agree at all. IMO, the Jim Garrison-8/11/1997
317 I believe you are confusing John Murphy of CNBC with Michael Murphy of the Caliduncan moyer-8/10/1997
316 This guy is an idiot. He also predicted CSCO is over valued at $47.Highway Jim-8/10/1997
315 dper: Core holdings are what i believe to be great companies that i plan on holJim Garrison-8/10/1997
314 You, I believe, a while back, gave your definition of "core" holdingsdper-8/10/1997
313 To all: John Murphy (technical guru on CNBC) indicating that Merck is testing uJim Garrison-8/10/1997
312 dper: <Lipitor thought very, very good alternative, but no pressing reason Jim Garrison-8/1/1997
311 FWIW: (Disclosure: My only pharmaceutical investment is Vanguard Sp Health, dper-7/31/1997
310 George: <Don't forget that MRK has a managed pharmacy business, that is Jim Garrison-7/28/1997
309 Jim, Don't forget that MRK has a managed pharmacy business, that is very aGeorge Dawson-7/28/1997
308 Bruce: <The article warned that growth could drop in half. Does anyone have Jim Garrison-7/28/1997
307 I want to bring the discussion back to Merck. A recent issue of Fortune discussRavBruce-7/28/1997
306 Sean: <Makes up for the big March and April losses.> You got that right. Jim Garrison-7/17/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News