SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Read-Rite
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5058 49 0 RDRT
Emcee:  Mark Fleming Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3308 Dennis, >Are you waiting for $4 to 5 as a entry price. No, I don't haveTom Simpson-5/24/1998
3307 John's comment was that SSB never had a "Strong Buy" they only haDennis R. Duke-5/24/1998
3306 Your right. The SSB estimate is for a loss of 46 cents in this quarter. I guessDennis R. Duke-5/24/1998
3305 Didn't they always have the buy rating on the stock? I know they did a fewgrogger-5/23/1998
3304 I hope they are right, but I also remember they had a price target of $45 when grogger-5/23/1998
3303 Regarding >> To get the "bear" side of the story read past poDebt Free-5/23/1998
3302 Tom, Thanx for the to the point summary. It was very informative. It will bDebt Free-5/23/1998
3301 Doug Stitch; <i><<What do you currently see as a bottom? >>&lStitch-5/23/1998
3300 Hi there Mr. Stitch, >What do you currently see as a bottom? That is precisTom Simpson-5/23/1998
3299 Tom, What do you currently see as a bottom? I am just starting to look into tDebt Free-5/23/1998
3298 Are you looking for margin call? anatoly goldin-5/23/1998
3297 >BTW, if this quarter is breakeven or better...... or if they win the lotterTom Simpson-5/23/1998
3296 Prissy, risk adverse..... Try building your own Cobra and driving it on tracksDennis R. Duke-5/23/1998
3295 Re: Morgan Stanley this is probably what Kurtzweil was referring to Message 4CPAMarty-5/23/1998
3294 That's exactly the point Bob. RDRT's crushing debt load is problematic,Frodo Baxter-5/23/1998
3293 Dennis, Thanks for your informative post. Did you get a chance to mention RDRobert Schling-5/23/1998
3292 Dennis, excellent work! Thank-you very much for posting your notes from your Larry J.-5/23/1998
3291 ...That's what sucked me in when I saw the Yahoo incorrect data that was poDavid Jones-5/22/1998
3290 I spoke to John Kurtzweil, CFO at RDRT, again this afternoon. He said some inteDennis R. Duke-5/22/1998
3289 Western Digital Breaks Ground On New Rochester R&D Facility, Doubles Size oWilliam Wang-5/22/1998
3288 Don't panic my broker spoke with the assistant analyst at Goldman yesterdaystockbug-5/22/1998
3287 That's what sucked me in when I saw the Yahoo incorrect data that was posteDennis R. Duke-5/22/1998
3286 That's not what I meant. I meant that the stock price is pretty close to RLM-5/22/1998
3285 Sorry about my mistake, I do notice that there is $0.07 difference between the William Wang-5/22/1998
3284 RLM, I have posted the same book value number on Msg# 3209. -------------- MsgWilliam Wang-5/22/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News