SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Command Systems, Inc. (CMND)
An SI Board Since March 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1956 4 0 CMND
Emcee:  DD™ Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
331 Dear Harold: In this case it is WAY BELOW book value. Just go to the balanceJDN-4/29/1998
330 Dear SOROS: I agree recent actions look less than professional but dont undereJDN-4/29/1998
329 Everyone keeps referring to cash value of the company. What exactly is the casHarold S.-4/29/1998
328 Here is why the stock is down - I replayed the conference call, jotted down allHarami-4/29/1998
327 I answered part of the question: $260,000 first is taken out of earning to be dRobert Floyd-4/29/1998
326 Dear Mark: I agree with calling the company but suggest perhaps letting thingsJDN-4/29/1998
325 Dear lbs: Look I cant guarantee the future and I dont at this moment know who JDN-4/29/1998
324 Cowen mentioned that they had discussions with management after the conference lbs-4/29/1998
323 Dear lbs: Well, someone is telling a fib. Chairman and CEO says business is gJDN-4/29/1998
322 Command Sys -2: Cites Infrastructure Investments NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Shares BACRDI-4/29/1998
321 Thank the underwriters don't be mad at them.. unless you were planning to rainwater-4/29/1998
320 JDN, I can't post the report. The basic thrust of it was that business prolbs-4/29/1998
319 From the report: 1. Net income was $455,000 2. 1988 Weighted averageRobert Floyd-4/29/1998
318 Not that I know of!! Nanda-4/29/1998
317 In your opinion has the BUSINESS MODEL of CMND changed since this company becamG-PARR-4/29/1998
316 Nanda, They would look like total fools and manipulators to come out and reverJohn Sikora-4/29/1998
315 <i>"I hear CMND is mad as hell at their underwriters. "</i&DD™-4/29/1998
314 The down-grade is on price tag for $14. It's a guaranteed strong buy at $7Y2k_fan-4/29/1998
313 BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That was a dead cat bounce!!! <G> And then the stocCosmo Kramer-4/29/1998
312 John, I do not agree with you. I would not be surprised to see both analysts reNanda-4/29/1998
311 Dear Nanda, Watch what happens before day end. ;) SOROS-4/29/1998
310 I have to disagree with your opinion of CMND being "dead money" for qMB-4/29/1998
309 Two puny, ignorant firms. When a major firm reviews the facts, and not the stuSOROS-4/29/1998
308 Nanda, The drop might be "insane"...but with both underwriters virtuJohn Sikora-4/29/1998
307 All: with such high volume, I wonder if folks who sold at the open are buying bSally Gallagher-4/29/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News