BRST--Instant Video (Formerly IVDO) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
BRST--Instant Video (Formerly IVDO)

An SI Board Since August 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1982	6	0	IVDO

Emcee: Scott Ozer	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
332	Let me just say that it would be less expensive to license Burst technology fro	Craig Emerzian	-	6/25/1997
331	Well I think the question is, why would anybody challenge them or infringe them	Earl Mincer	-	6/25/1997
330	< 1) Bursting sounds very basic. To the point that it might be challenged o	Earl Mincer	-	6/25/1997
329	<Have the patents been challenged before?> I am surprised by that questi	Nhiem Nguyen	-	6/25/1997
328	I'm sorry if this was discussed before. How solid are the patents (can they	Stock Puppy	-	6/25/1997
327	Thanks, Earl, for your response. I will be buying some shares in the next few d	Phil Maine	-	6/25/1997
326	<I can tell you from my experience that the courts are VERY pro-patent these	Nhiem Nguyen	-	6/25/1997
325	Actually, I was wondering when somebody would be confused by that. I guess it&	Earl Mincer	-	6/25/1997
324	Disregard previous post re: IVT vs IVDO. Guess it was too obvious.	Phil Maine	-	6/25/1997
323	A question from a lurker (potential investor): What is IVT? I thought the compa	Phil Maine	-	6/24/1997
322	Bursting works with all spatial compression methods, so of course Innovacom'	Craig Emerzian	-	6/24/1997
321	IVT is positioning itself in case we need to protect ourselves.	Craig Emerzian	-	6/24/1997
320	I do not speak for IVT so I must let Craig answer. However, I can tell you from	Earl Mincer	-	6/24/1997
319	But is IVDO in a position to PROTECT these patents against the juggernauts that	Stock Puppy	-	6/24/1997
318	2007-2016 and more to come. :) It's 17 years from date of issue. That has	Earl Mincer	-	6/24/1997
317	< Real-time systems will never be able to serve as many clients as seamlessl	Nhiem Nguyen	-	6/24/1997
316	Not bad, Nheim! It's not so much about idle time though but you're abs	Earl Mincer	-	6/23/1997
315	Earl, Thank you for taking the time to answer my question about real time. I r	Nhiem Nguyen	-	6/23/1997
314	IVT's Burstware(tm) could do amazing things with 1300 MHz. Even better, it	Earl Mincer	-	6/23/1997
313	Earl, thanks for pointing out my mistake. The bandwidth for LMDS is 1300 MHz,	John Hon	-	6/23/1997
312	28 GHz is the carrier frequency, not the bandwidth. BIG difference. But I agree	Earl Mincer	-	6/23/1997
311	Craig, thanks for the very interesting and informative posts. It would be very	John Hon	-	6/23/1997
310	BurstwareTM would only perform better and faster with more powerful processors.	Craig Emerzian	-	6/21/1997
309	Well it's 3 o'clock in the morning and I can't sleep so I thought I	Craig Emerzian	-	6/21/1997
308	I'll need more time to respond to ALL the posts, but allow me to start with	Earl Mincer	-	6/21/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):