SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intermagnetics (IMG)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3448 16 0 IMG
Emcee:  Gregg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3323 I am well aware of IMG's long standing business reputation. The question waSemiBull-3/11/2000
3322 AMSC not even close with: 1. experience 2. time in the business 3. manufacturinFisherman1-3/10/2000
3321 From a product segment standpoint, doesn't AMSC offer a broader offering wiSemiBull-3/10/2000
3320 I saw your post on Yahoo, Tom. I watched the Bloomberg interview. I particulaMark Shaw-3/10/2000
3319 Mark, I agree, the quarterly earnings conference call should be a good point toTom Linzmeier-3/8/2000
3318 Not a bad showing for IMG with the rest of the market down so much. Maybe the wMark Shaw-3/7/2000
3317 I agree, The four other superconducting companies have all raised funds in the Tom Linzmeier-3/6/2000
3316 Tom, I noticed that AMSC has just raised over $200 million with the secondary oMark Shaw-3/2/2000
3315 mark, I agree with your opinion. tTom Linzmeier-3/2/2000
3314 Looks like we're going to give back all of the recent gains. I think all ofMark Shaw-3/1/2000
3313 Mark, Some thoughts on selling at 34.00. With a cost of 6.00 your gain is 28.00Tom Linzmeier-2/29/2000
3312 good luck to all longs....one word of caution. the relatively small float meanSemiBull-2/29/2000
3311 but either way...best to all on this board...Gerald Thomas-2/29/2000
3310 as much as I would like to tell you to stay in...I know your history and years Gerald Thomas-2/29/2000
3309 Good point, Ron. My average cost is just under $6 (purchased way back in the eMark Shaw-2/28/2000
3308 I believe I heard once to sell your losers... and let your winners run... Irustyjack-2/28/2000
3307 I'm stunned, Gerald. Four months ago, you couldn't give this stock awaMark Shaw-2/28/2000
3306 what the H*** happened here...is this qcom or IMG...Did symbols get mixed up? Gerald Thomas-2/28/2000
3305 How about this for the reason. Notice that if IMG had anything at all to say aRobert Florin-2/28/2000
3304 If IMG goes to 500 this year, I'll short it! Heck, I might even short at 45Artslaw-2/27/2000
3303 I was referring to my previous post, Wafa. Some guy over on Yahoo said it was Mark Shaw-2/27/2000
3302 Wow Mark. I don't know about 500, but I sure would be delighted with 50 forWafa SHIHABI-2/27/2000
3301 Good link, Wafa. The run-up back in 1995 was not due to institutional buying. Mark Shaw-2/27/2000
3300 Mark, the reason IMG is not on people's radar IMO is that if you type supekormac-2/27/2000
3299 Its just as Adam said to Eve on their first kiss, "step back honey, I don&Wafa SHIHABI-2/27/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):