SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
IPIC
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1359 13 0 IPIC
Emcee:  David D. Long Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
334 >>"that is a major weight loss and could cause other problems...&quojlib-3/7/1997
333 <<<<<Anyway, good info and I need to clear up that I wasn't V.-3/6/1997
332 See my other reply. BTW, from what I have read that is a major weight loss and Jim Fisher-3/6/1997
331 Or another way of saying it is that Redux has the right degree flipped moleculeJim Fisher-3/6/1997
330 the stock split doesn't affect the p/e or its growth rate.P.Prazeres-3/6/1997
329 >>"By the way, Redux doesn't work.."<< Your margin fjlib-3/6/1997
328 Paulo, Are you accounting for the 3 for 1 split for coca cola 5/12/97? How doKS-3/6/1997
327 Paulo, We are a lucky group to have your major economic insights! Were you an V.-3/5/1997
326 Thanks Paulo, I think I have about 5 yrs to catch up with you and Vicki. I jualice simmons-3/5/1997
325 Well we are back above 28 but not much movement on the bid and ask and the voluP.Prazeres-3/5/1997
324 Hi Jim, I have a friend who has lost (60) on Redux, a lb. per day. Alicealice simmons-3/5/1997
323 Too tired my sorry rear-end, you been up much later than this. I wasn't trJim Fisher-3/4/1997
322 Jim, In my post #315 of Feb. 27, I stated: <<<<I see support at 2V.-3/4/1997
321 So, mince meat, its still at 28, will it go to your support level of 20-22? StJim Fisher-3/4/1997
320 Yeah. So what am I now, mincemeat? <gggg> Paulo's the pro, you'd V.-2/28/1997
319 Most helpful, thank you.Jim Fisher-2/28/1997
318 Andreas, Up late, like me! I surely hope you are right. Best wishes, VickiV.-2/28/1997
317 hi vicky, i think we're on the edge of the nearterm future not only of IPICandreas fauler-2/28/1997
316 paulo, you're right, techs were hitten hard by greenspan's blurb and thandreas fauler-2/28/1997
315 Paulo & disgruntled IPIC followers, Technicals are naturally looking poorlV.-2/27/1997
314 Not necessarily, Jim. Here is how to play it out... If you think that a contiP.Prazeres-2/27/1997
313 Cutting to the chase, new entry point is 24?Jim Fisher-2/27/1997
312 Well, needless to say, many stocks were technically damaged today, including P.Prazeres-2/27/1997
311 Andreas, I had been posting all the technicals, but it was very, very late lasV.-2/27/1997
310 vicky, i follow this thread since my first post here and i appreciate your infoandreas fauler-2/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):