SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Bay Networks (BAY)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4270 6 0 BAY
Emcee:  John Messbauer Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3345 I can't offer anything on the short position but this may brighten up your Daveyk-3/15/1997
3344 To All...Ben Robelen is on the board of Bay...His son Scott Robelen was a moneyKC-3/15/1997
3343 Fear & Greed drive the market. Looks like the Fear index is now way up. TheDoug-3/15/1997
3342 It looks like another bad qtr for Bay.A lot of shareholders have been dependingadam hefian-3/15/1997
3341 Why sell ? ? Consider this - Bay employee had been given many thousands of oHop Sing-3/15/1997
3340 <BTW, they consider BAY as an early stage 1 stock which has already declinedBosco-3/15/1997
3339 CSCO was just listed as unfavorable in a publication called the Professional TThe BayWatcher-3/15/1997
3338 hi Tim; i hope you are right. If BAY can hit the .20 number, it will be close Bosco-3/15/1997
3337 To John M., the Father of this Thread: Happy Anniversary!! This thread was staPaul Fine-3/15/1997
3336 hi JDN and all; no, i don't know the replacement in Asia. However, so longBosco-3/15/1997
3335 Andrew, I don't think the Street is expecting robust eps from Bay this quaIbexx-3/15/1997
3334 Yes Baywatcher OBE WAN has taught you well. Just kidding. It is refreshing toDarryl Hamamy-3/15/1997
3333 To All, I have a considerable stake in this company and am very concerned abouASB-3/15/1997
3332 Baywatcher, Thanks for all your posts. (I was just kidding in my previous one.Ibexx-3/15/1997
3331 Ibexx, I only responded to you because it was the last post. I have been readThe BayWatcher-3/15/1997
3330 Baywatcher, Hey, no need to convince me--I have been accumulating this stock fIbexx-3/15/1997
3329 The short section on Bay in the Barron's interview lacked any meaningful rThe BayWatcher-3/15/1997
3328 In the tech industry earnings are much more volatile and not a good anchor poinCrossy-3/15/1997
3327 Vepoc - Your post is well reasoned and makes many good points. The only thing John Koligman-3/15/1997
3326 Timothy and All: I have read many of the better-informed analysts. Most wererupert1-3/15/1997
3325 Don, Most of the insiders who recently sold were the ones House fired. Small Ibexx-3/15/1997
3324 Back on February 26th I entered post #3101 that basically stated two insiders fJohn Koligman-3/15/1997
3323 Here is what Joan Lippin had to say about BAY in MAr. 17th interview in BarronsC.N.S.-3/15/1997
3322 Don,so am I at approximately 22. I have followed the short picks on Barrons,likTimothy Tashjian-3/15/1997
3321 JDN,I heard the same thing from people on the street that the Asian V.P. was onTimothy Tashjian-3/15/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):