SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
TCHP - Telechips
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
636 1 0 TCHP
Emcee:  Rohit Sood Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
336 Good advice! YOU GIVE good Advice! And now I have the solution to my financia_Highlander-4/21/1997
335 Think about it.... first I am not into making recommendations, for when I do tGreen Receipt-4/21/1997
334 All things being equal in your message, if they succedded, then why are they in_Highlander-4/21/1997
333 Having been to their office, and seen their product, I think they would be in mGreen Receipt-4/21/1997
332 They added the 'D' for a few weeks when they devalued everything with t_Highlander-4/21/1997
331 I had suffered the same losses. Why does the company keep changing the ticker nTheInvestor-4/20/1997
330 There are at least three people in this group who claim to have not only voted _Highlander-4/19/1997
329 Highlander: You are not alone. Why don't we take a poll on how many peoplTheInvestor-4/18/1997
328 GGM: So what are you? Some sort of Market-Maker? Personally, I did not buy a_Highlander-4/18/1997
327 Gavin Bravo, couldn't agree more. Did you notice in the SEC filing the meBruce H. Becker-4/18/1997
326 i can't understand why there is so much (or any at all) whining and complaGavin G. Murphy-4/18/1997
325 No slander intended<grin> and lots of sympathy since you have managed to_Highlander-4/17/1997
324 Well! my 1000 shares are now only 67 shares. I'll just let them sit. Hay! dDave Triplett-4/17/1997
323 Of course I didn't <b>gain</b> anything from the reverse split.Green Receipt-4/17/1997
322 I bought it when it was around $6 a share... now my investment is pretty much wGreen Receipt-4/17/1997
321 The SEC filings are deemed true by the company filing them. The SEC gets their David Cimbol-4/17/1997
320 OBS: We would all like to think that a SEC Filing is credible. We would like _Highlander-4/17/1997
319 DRS: You have a really good handle on this one, guy! How much did you gain fr_Highlander-4/17/1997
318 DT: It is reasonable to do normal 1:2 or 1:3 splits when a stock has a value i_Highlander-4/17/1997
317 Dave Where did you get the information? It is very detailed. I must thank yoObserver-4/16/1997
316 Dave, I couldn't agree with you more. This company has a track record of TheInvestor-4/16/1997
315 Gavin sorry for the delay. To answere your question . No I do not have a loDEEPAL R. PATEL-4/16/1997
314 Sometimes the difference between risk and scam is very little. No more under a Dave Triplett-4/16/1997
313 Its not stealing. I would imagine enough shareholders voted for the proposal. Green Receipt-4/16/1997
312 What a joke and what an education. If this is legal then its legal theivery plaDave Triplett-4/16/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News