SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera!
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4736 10 0 NAMX
Emcee:  SOROS Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3361 morning I beg to differ - the curry capital of the world including India must Probart-4/6/1998
3360 Bob the following was reported on this thread: "Paul often said the numberZeev Hed-4/6/1998
3359 They are taking on too much debt.proud dad-4/6/1998
3358 Gosh..........this morning for awhile there it sounded like a real thread insteBottom Line-4/6/1998
3357 > I don't consider myself food! Oops, sorry Phil. I spent 4 years in AbMichael T Currie-4/6/1998
3356 I don't consider myself food!proud dad-4/6/1998
3355 > Also on the reserves issue Mike Curry said 30% up or down was what they woMichael T Currie-4/6/1998
3354 Now I'm confused - look at the banner above. Says Subject: NAMX -- North amTaryn Poole-4/6/1998
3353 Well, I got around to reading Wednesday's WSJ (4/1/98) a few minutes ago, aM. M. Jones-4/5/1998
3352 Ray, I think your argument is a rational base for speculation. If your strategyZeev Hed-4/5/1998
3351 Confucious say those who shut ears miss mucho info.M. M. Jones-4/5/1998
3350 zeev, I don't think anyone posted 144 mm shares was a confirmed number buSidney Reilly-4/5/1998
3349 I talked with UPR about a lawsuit regarding their Colorado land a year ago. UPM. M. Jones-4/5/1998
3348 Reportedly Michael Stamm and Jack Messman, president of UPR, know each other prM. M. Jones-4/5/1998
3347 But, Bob, the fact is (according to a poster quoting Stamm) is that right now tZeev Hed-4/5/1998
3346 <<I simply bring a barrage of facts (sometimes repetition of knownSidney Reilly-4/5/1998
3345 >By the way, what is your position on this stock (I presume you own >someRay Juliano-4/5/1998
3344 >Then first we need to see the last of the non-shareholders here >who'Ray Juliano-4/5/1998
3343 zeev, There you go again. This is the type of distortion I am talking about. Sidney Reilly-4/5/1998
3342 Ray, I agree with you whole heartedly that name calling, and "agenda doubtZeev Hed-4/5/1998
3341 Zeev, I understand what you are saying and it does have merit, but only if oneRay Juliano-4/5/1998
3340 Bob, don't you think that a better advice to Ray (The doomsayers have been Zeev Hed-4/5/1998
3339 Bob, Take a nap. Sounds like you need one.bob-4/5/1998
3338 Then first we need to see the last of the non-shareholders here who's only Sidney Reilly-4/5/1998
3337 bob, I am certainly upset that 3 wells were not being metered as we were tolSidney Reilly-4/5/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):