SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
RealNetworks (NASDAQ:RNWK)
An SI Board Since September 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5843 91 0 RNWK
Emcee:  esecurities(tm) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3368 John Zellner - KMXV (Kansas City) "Californication is compelling and antDealer-5/25/1999
3367 To Balloon: I'm also in for the long haul (at higher levels). This B.S. corzalesky-5/25/1999
3366 in the first hour of trading...Bernhard Michaelis-5/25/1999
3365 Oh my. I just noticed that SI stock quote puts rnwk at a low for the day of 62 trouthead-5/25/1999
3364 I just doubled my position in rnwk. I will be surprised if it drifts much lowertrouthead-5/25/1999
3363 AMEN SBerglowe-5/25/1999
3362 Well, I mean, the rise has been equally spectacular ... and when a lot of folksBGR-5/25/1999
3361 I think the moves that we are seeing in the tech sector are being exacerbated SBerglowe-5/25/1999
3360 Thx! :-) BGR-5/25/1999
3359 I'd like to think we're near or at support here. However, many bluechSBerglowe-5/25/1999
3358 this morning aol signed up Gmstar to handle their TV guide...Was this a loss foPruguy-5/25/1999
3357 This morning's Briefing...note RealNetworks references... The bad side... Mark Otto-5/25/1999
3356 <Personally, think the tech/Net rout is virtually over. Not big trading voluRobert Rose-5/25/1999
3355 That's funny! SBerglowe-5/25/1999
3354 Stick by my conviction, Pru. The Nets will recover. Among the reasons is thisB. A. Marlow-5/25/1999
3353 Ralph gets a lot more press than he wants, because they usually get his commentPruguy-5/25/1999
3352 Thought you were the "wise man," Pru. What's Ralph's take? B. A. Marlow-5/25/1999
3351 no one is making the argument you are trying to support, but no one here is disPruguy-5/24/1999
3350 MINUTE TIME 125 to 79 = 1.78 48 to 20 = 2.4 This correction is but a momentaBeta Nasdaq-5/24/1999
3349 Poor Greenspan ... BGR-5/24/1999
3348 Ok you guys win...RealNetworks stock will go up forever. Fundamentals don'Cascade Berry-5/24/1999
3347 don't you know that the newest quicktime IS A BETA.....there isn't anytPruguy-5/24/1999
3346 Due for a correction? Then what is going on now? 125 to 70. Pretty serious hsam-5/24/1999
3345 I've watched RNWK go from 18 to 13 to 48 to 20 to 250 (split) now @ 70. WeBeta Nasdaq-5/24/1999
3344 And Quicktime is a brand new competitor...or could it be I have seen .MOV formaDale Baker-5/24/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News