SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
GZMO
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
438 23 0 GZMO
Emcee:  mike mulhearn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
338There is a nice article in the Boston Herald today concerning GZMO and "denIcebrg-11/24/2000
337If you define vaccine as something that elicits an immune response, then Altarextnsaf-11/13/2000
336I think this questions was asked in the CC. If I remember it right there are diSpekulatius-11/8/2000
335Nigel, good point. I don't think one should ignore CRXA, not that one couldPseudo Biologist-11/8/2000
334>>One issue that comes up and often leads to near-religious arguments is tkeokalani'nui-11/8/2000
333<i>But, of course, even without CLTR it would be a stretch to call CRXA a nigel bates-11/8/2000
332<i>Have you strong positive feelings in the sector?</i> Not really.Pseudo Biologist-11/8/2000
331PB, to keep this thought alive until we're kicked off the thread, I have notkeokalani'nui-11/8/2000
330PB, I pulled this together almost a year ago when studying biom. I haven't keokalani'nui-11/8/2000
329<i>Time to build a sub-portfolio of cancer vaccine cos?</i> InteresPseudo Biologist-11/8/2000
328Here is why there may be a distinction between approaches, and why gzmo may be tkeokalani'nui-11/8/2000
327Thanks, somewhere else during the year GZMO said it was looking into whether addCChalmers-11/8/2000
326>>questions about GZMO's right to use the Kugler technique<< Frsim1-11/8/2000
325Kugler's work first reported early this year. However, your find from aacr cCChalmers-11/7/2000
324Hey guys, I know you all figured this out a long time ago. But I just had the Akeokalani'nui-11/7/2000
323Thanks for the collection. I take it as a sign that market interest in GZMO is mCChalmers-11/5/2000
322Jeffrey, I posted this as a summary of some DD on gizmo... (mostly stuff from yooaktownaj-11/4/2000
321I would guess that a brokerage house must get in and put this on the radar screeSpekulatius-10/28/2000
320Peter, Wonder if gzmo is nearing critical mass; during the last 3 months they hExtra Pale-10/23/2000
319jeffrey, For the market to permanently sit up and take notice, a company needs Biomaven-10/23/2000
318Question on how this stage biotech company normally trades. Is it a case that thjeffbas-10/22/2000
317Nigel,I think Jeffrey got this right. The fact that the antigen discovery capabiSpekulatius-10/21/2000
316The moon, less the 'Genzyme discount' (g)... I agree, though. They are unigel bates-10/20/2000
315The most important part of the CC. It took listening about 5 times to get this ejeffbas-10/19/2000
314Oct. 19 /PRNewswire/ -- Genzyme Corp. today reported that total revenues for Gennigel bates-10/19/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News