CLTR COULTER PHARMACEUTICAL | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
CLTR COULTER PHARMACEUTICAL

An SI Board Since January 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
666	17	0	CLTR

Emcee: HARRY GIBSON	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
341	Bluejeans, I bought the stock at 12 also. Doubled down as I sold puts earlier i	jayhawk969	-	9/29/1999
340	<I just bought some calls with the stock around $12. > Bought some with	LLCF	-	9/29/1999
339	Updated version of the Bloomberg story: quote.bloomberg.com South San Francisc	RCMac	-	9/29/1999
338	>> Well, who knows if this is the bottom << I sure don't, as w	RCMac	-	9/29/1999
337	and I bought the stock at $12. Should be an interesting next few months.	bluejeans	-	9/29/1999
336	Well, who knows if this is the bottom, but I just bought some calls with the st	Biomaven	-	9/29/1999
335	thanks for the link.	bluejeans	-	9/29/1999
334	quote.bloomberg.com AA	Joe Wesley	-	9/29/1999
333	Has anyone found the filing update that CNBC referred to this morning?	bluejeans	-	9/29/1999
332	Peter, IDPH is an interesting, but not IMO cheap play in the mid 90s. they hav	Vector1	-	9/28/1999
331	Bottom Fishing Opened a new position today on the uptick just over 16. Let'	RWReeves	-	9/27/1999
330	< both good bargains at current prices, IMO. > Thanks DAK	LLCF	-	9/27/1999
329	It is worth noting that IDPH recently dropped to around 90 from a high of 140.	Biomaven	-	9/27/1999
328	rkw, As noted by others I thought I was clear. I had not added to the CLTR pos	Vector1	-	9/27/1999
327	< CLTR would also seem like a natural takeout candidate to me.> Thanks	LLCF	-	9/26/1999
326	I haven't staked my professional reputation on CLTR because I haven't g	Bob L	-	9/26/1999
325	The point is that people were incredibly bullish on the run to $35 with widespr	rkrw	-	9/26/1999
324	cf Biotech vs Shorts post 222 V1 to Peter Suzman. Hit me between the eyes. Don	W PAUL	-	9/26/1999
323	<i>I asked the big bull V1</i> Someplace around here, in one of th	scaram(o)uche	-	9/26/1999
322	<I asked the big bull V1 but he wimped out of answering. > You won't	LLCF	-	9/26/1999
321	Let's separate the men from the boys. Who's sticking to their guns an	rkrw	-	9/26/1999
320	<BTW, if everybody would just mail me their CLTR shares it would save them t	LLCF	-	9/24/1999
319	DAK, I think the answer is "Yes". They don't get any credit for	RWReeves	-	9/24/1999
318	FYI: Message 11301536 Message 11305092 DAK	LLCF	-	9/20/1999
317	So if CLTR resubmits on say Oct.1, is the FDA again obligated to respond in 60	LLCF	-	9/20/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):