SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
American Eco (ECGOF, ECX on Toronto exchange)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2841 13 0 ECX
Emcee:  david james Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
341 Bobby, You're right, it is way undervalued. Short selling and concerns aboMARK BARGER-8/5/1997
340 thanks...strange isn't it..it just looks so way undervaluedBobby Yellin-8/5/1997
339 6.2 == current stock price/'97 estimate = ( 7 7/16 )/1.20 Using the 1.8Harry_Behemoth-8/5/1997
338 stock smart said pe currently about 6.2 and compared to other companies in the Bobby Yellin-8/5/1997
337 Very interesting analysis, david. To paraphrase Mark Twain, history may not reHarry_Behemoth-8/4/1997
336 I was looking through Philip Environmental - now Philip Services Corp for some david james-8/4/1997
335 the growth just reported looks phenomenal..I agree with you..Bobby Yellin-8/4/1997
334 Greetings! I've been following this board very closely as of latRaymond James Norris-8/2/1997
333 >>``The continued growth and success of American Eco for improved sharehoMichael Anthony-8/1/1997
332 >>One that might make even M Anthony convinced.<< I'll buy it Michael Anthony-8/1/1997
331 Any information about these 2 subsidaries? Were they profitable businesses? I cSeth Weisinger-8/1/1997
330 Friday August 1 12:32 PM EDT Company Press Release American Eco To Focus on Harry_Behemoth-8/1/1997
329 - Yeah, I couldn't resist and bought a bunch more today at 7 7/16. I figurdavid james-8/1/1997
328 I sold @ $ 7.375 as I don't like holding a falling stock. The debenture hVALUESPEC-8/1/1997
327 Rookie, I clearly agree. The spring just gets wound tighter and tighter!! It wMARK BARGER-8/1/1997
326 The way the stock has acted recently, the market seems to be chanting BUY BACK Harry_Behemoth-8/1/1997
325 Zeev- What I really wanted to know is if the removal of the floor had anythingHarry_Behemoth-8/1/1997
324 - I believe the original floor was required because the debentures had not beendavid james-8/1/1997
323 The Rookie, you have to explain to me : "amortize the debentures at less tZeev Hed-7/31/1997
322 Does anyone have any insight as to why they removed the floor on the debenturesHarry_Behemoth-7/31/1997
321 Nice work David. You're saving me a lot of time. I haven't been "VALUESPEC-7/31/1997
320 - I just talked to Andrew White at EIFH so I can correct some of these commentdavid james-7/31/1997
319 Yesterday, Eric in the MF had this to say about CapitalGNS comments on EIFH: {VALUESPEC-7/31/1997
318 that should have been 1994 .903 mill 1995 2.85 mill 215% increase david james-7/30/1997
317 I am still astonished by this estimate of $1.80 for 1998 by one of the analysdavid james-7/30/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News