SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
SNRS- Sunrise Technologies
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4140 25 0 SNRS
Emcee:  WILLIAM BLACK Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3415 SNRS isnt moving.. Why start a position here? wait for it to get some directPaul A-11/9/1999
3414 Judging by his research, he must be one of those slimey short-sellers who don&#peter michaelson-11/9/1999
3413 Waldeen: Considering you are not an investor (at least long) in sunrise and cobob beck-11/9/1999
3412 Where have all the weasels gone??? bob bob beck-11/9/1999
3411 Bob, I am not an opthamologist or optician, but let's just say my expertisWaldeen-11/8/1999
3410 Sunrise Stock: Market Watcher Says Company Statement Too Vague NEW YORK (Dow StockDung-11/7/1999
3409 Ditto to that. Waldeen, please tell us more. Color me impressed. peterpeter michaelson-11/7/1999
3408 Waldeen- very enlightening posting! You are an prime example of what is good Maximum_Gain-11/7/1999
3407 HOW TO LIE WITHOUT LYING Part two. Any of you longs, just ask and I'll diTripleT-11/7/1999
3406 Waldeen: Very informative post. May I ask your profession or qualifications fbob beck-11/7/1999
3405 Factual background on previous post: Since the previous post was based on my oWaldeen-11/7/1999
3404 Joe, The very basis of this income statement is questionable at best since theWaldeen-11/7/1999
3403 Yeah, why bother indeed... Just for fun, I guess and to keep the misguided awayLand Shark-11/6/1999
3402 Your BS posts are pure drivel... I don't think that the company will be ablLand Shark-11/6/1999
3401 Sure, and the FDA held up the carpet to make the cover-up even easier. Get reabob beck-11/6/1999
3400 Yields,, why bother? You are respected at what you do and you make a good livSEAN007-11/6/1999
3399 Joe: Saw the post on RB. Very realistic projection if approval comes by Marchbob beck-11/6/1999
3398 Oh, what great optimism. Let's see 70% profit margin, LOL! What crap. Let&#Land Shark-11/6/1999
3397 Bob, EyesMD reposted this from AOL on Raging Bull. GOOD AOL POST... SubjectJoe-11/6/1999
3396 Interesting to listen to uninformed shorts who haven't done diddly DD on a bob beck-11/6/1999
3395 <i>Would any sane Dr. want a machine that bad?</i> Only if he'lifeisgood-11/6/1999
3394 SNRS management killed the old set of the slides that they said was for FDA appTripleT-11/6/1999
3393 Could you please explain how this company could be worth "a buck or two&qulifeisgood-11/5/1999
3392 True, some have covered. Different people have different trading styles. I tendLand Shark-11/5/1999
3391 I really don't consider those people "analysts". More like majorbob beck-11/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News