SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Interactive Network, Inc. *** INNN ***
An SI Board Since October 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
418 5 0 INNN
Emcee:  sylvan Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
343 Dwight have you read Gates new book yet? On page 122 he mentions the use of inScott A. Trapp-5/6/1999
342 Scott, I'm a huge believer (obviously) in interactivity. Personal opiniondwight vickers-5/5/1999
341 Tell me now interactive TV is not catching the eye of the big dogs. Here is anScott A. Trapp-5/5/1999
340 Dwight, Could the patent been issued in Sept 98, but applied for a year or so pGeorge Mc Geary-5/5/1999
339 Hi Scott, Hmmmmmmm. No one was working on patents in 1998. Got to think thatdwight vickers-5/4/1999
338 Dwight this patent is from Sept 1998 Scott Claims ---------------------------Scott A. Trapp-5/4/1999
337 Hi Scott, I actually copied all that stuff in 1994 at the patent office. Justdwight vickers-5/3/1999
336 This one may be more interesting I like the advertising twist Scott Claims --Scott A. Trapp-5/3/1999
335 Here is one of the patents let me know if you want the other 5 Scott Parent CaScott A. Trapp-5/3/1999
334 Mary, on INNN's "Raging Bull" board raised the possibility that Idwight vickers-5/2/1999
333 Hope you're right, Joe. But that would make the patents worth $400 to $500dwight vickers-5/1/1999
332 I don't know. I think that if AT&T incorporates the technology into @hjoe inti-5/1/1999
331 INNN owns the patents. NTN owns a bad business model. You're not serious dwight vickers-4/30/1999
330 Hey dwight, can you believe it. It looks like as a long term investment, INNN joe inti-4/30/1999
329 Yes. (1.4 million as I type) Wondering about the narrow spread we've had dwight vickers-4/30/1999
328 Hey Dwight you think we can hit 1M shares today? Scott Scott A. Trapp-4/30/1999
327 We're moving now. Scott Scott A. Trapp-4/30/1999
326 You are a dreamer.......... Dwight (But keep up the good work!!) dwight vickers-4/28/1999
325 How about a few hundred million in inflated stock... What's 3 million sharJostacy O.-4/28/1999
324 "Few hundred million". To the government that's a pittance. In dwight vickers-4/28/1999
323 If those giants cut such a deal it seems it would stand to reason that innn'Jostacy O.-4/27/1999
322 Excellent price action today. Would have liked higher volume, though. Shoulddwight vickers-4/27/1999
321biz.yahoo.comMike Jafari-4/26/1999
320 I'm traveling, so a bit out of touch, but I haven't heard anything. Thdwight vickers-4/21/1999
319 Dwight, Wondering if any news out?? Thanks in advance PRC PRC-4/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News