SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Critical Investing Workshop
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
35685 103 0
Emcee:  Uncle Frank Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
34610jambo, funny how its possible to be away for 5-6 weeks and not really miss anythabuelita-2/26/2001
34609Hi Rose - thanks for the welcome! Also, thanks for taking on Frank regarding hijambo-bwana-2/26/2001
34608LOL jambo, it's good to have you back.abuelita-2/26/2001
34607<i>go back and read what you wrote--that during the decline the G&K crjambo-bwana-2/26/2001
34606<i>As far as being gleeful about the misfortunes of others, that is a nonstekboy-2/26/2001
34605<i>Btw, my portfolio returned 30% today, leaving me just a tad shy of my Njambo-bwana-2/26/2001
34604<i>you didn't strike a nerve, you just pissed me off by moving from snjambo-bwana-2/26/2001
34603Hi jambo, Nice to hear from you. I hope all is well. I appreciate your suppoPoet-2/26/2001
34602Hi Poet, long time no talk! I have been on an extended vacation and got back ajambo-bwana-2/26/2001
34601<i>I find it highly interesting that Poet would view my words as a threat hobo-2/16/2001
34600If you look at earlier versions of the Workshop's thread header you'll fUncle Frank-2/9/2001
34599I was wondering how "The Critical Investing Workshop" turned up in my lurqer-2/9/2001
34598<I>What you are advocating is the substitution of vigilante action for dueabuelita-2/8/2001
34597>> Publishing unsolicited and degrading PMs is probably the most effectiveUncle Frank-2/8/2001
34596<I>I was decrying the practice of publishing private messages. It serves nabuelita-2/8/2001
34595All <i>parties</i> do not want to stop. It would appear that only thAllansAlias-2/8/2001
34594If the parties involved want this stopped, then shouldn't the rest of us stoGreta Mc-2/8/2001
34593VBG. No, I do not <i>out</i>.AllansAlias-2/8/2001
34592>> No sir, you are finding a fault in Poet's response No, I'm jusUncle Frank-2/8/2001
34591I have no doubt whatsoever that the PM's are genuine and unaltered. This intAllansAlias-2/8/2001
34590I wasn't defending anyone, Allan. I was decrying the practice of publishingUncle Frank-2/8/2001
34589Uncle Frank, Even though our paths have crossed infrequently, you and I have enAllansAlias-2/8/2001
34588>> I understand Poet may have been suspended for printing the truth here. Uncle Frank-2/8/2001
34587SI is a crock. Save copies of everything.Win Smith-2/8/2001
34586Hi Poet <I> In fact, my loving wife is sitting in my lap typing this as Iabuelita-2/8/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):