SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Critical Investing Workshop
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
35685 103 0
Emcee:  Uncle Frank Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
34660Gimme five minutes with that Italian goddess from Soprano I wouldnt last four, bJim Willie CB-3/5/2001
34659I didn't see that Husky's post was deleted. Thanks for mentioning it. IPoet-3/5/2001
34658Hi Poet, I see the husky's post has been deleted. I realized that you were jambo-bwana-3/5/2001
34657Hmmm, well if we were part of the cause, then they're thinking less clearly Poet-3/5/2001
34656<<I do wonder, though, if you truly feel that people are responsible for tim a survivor-3/5/2001
34655<<FWIW, I don't think that you had any ulterior motive in posting whatim a survivor-3/5/2001
34654<<FWIW, I don't think that you had any ulterior motive in posting whatim a survivor-3/5/2001
34653Keith, That was an impassioned and thoughtful post, and I don't think anyonPoet-3/5/2001
34652Keith, to blame Poet and Rose for getting banned from the Porch is a bit of a stjambo-bwana-3/5/2001
34651<<I do have to say, Keith, that it was likely your own actions that got yoim a survivor-3/5/2001
34650<i>That is a great find, volty's chief henchwoman explaining his callsjambo-bwana-3/5/2001
34649Hi Rose, I think that any law-suit against Voltaire or anyone else for that mattjambo-bwana-3/5/2001
34648<i>I believe in Angels</i> "I have a dream, a song to sing To average joe-3/4/2001
34647Dalin, I resemble that remark! jpgillCactus Jack-3/4/2001
34646<i>or that we all need a disclaimer stating the obvious. </i> lawyeDalin-3/4/2001
34645JPG: Here's an interesting article from today's New York Times about HePoet-3/4/2001
34644Poet, Thanks for the explanation. I was under the impression that you would haCactus Jack-3/4/2001
34643What I have objected to all along, and have said here ad nauseum, is <I>noPoet-3/4/2001
34642Poet, "My interest in any class action suit lies in people who have followCactus Jack-3/4/2001
34641Hi Poet I reacted rather brusquely to Keith's comments this morning I'mabuelita-3/4/2001
34640<I>I dont even visit this thread, yet somehow, your words or assumptions oabuelita-3/4/2001
34639You were banned from the Porch for writing what you did? I'm sorry to hear tPoet-3/4/2001
34638To rose and poet....I am in a very big hurry.......I will have to adress this maim a survivor-3/4/2001
34637Hi jpgill, Not inconsistent at all, actually. I hate to see people get hurt. Poet-3/4/2001
34636Hi Rob Good to talk to you again. And, it's good to have something to joke abuelita-3/3/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):