SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Barrick Gold (ABX)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3558 49 0 ABX
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3483Yes!! When I saw the message against my bookmark and 'Barrick' I thoughEnigma-2/24/2004
3482Looking like we have a growth company here again (ggggggggg) We better start lorusset-2/24/2004
3481Very likely - although I'm not sure if the court can look at who's behinEnigma-12/10/2003
3480I am afraid the analysis buy, sell of hold for Barrick stands on risk/reward. TDundee Maples-12/10/2003
3479I wonder if Appel gave Blanchard advice during the preparation of their lawsuit russet-12/10/2003
3478<i>I would assume that it was booked ONLY as each hedging transaction was russet-12/10/2003
3477>>This allowed Barrick to generate a massive, cumulative $2.3 billion proftyc:>-12/10/2003
3476Is this the prof. from Memorial University?Enigma-12/10/2003
3475I am enclosing the entire article for your myopic analysis. I believe the articKen Benes-12/10/2003
3474The idiot doing that analysis is a fool, and doesn't understand a covered forusset-12/9/2003
3473Post the source - of course! You should know better than that.Enigma-12/9/2003
3472Reading the following analysis of Barrick's condition, you might want to reaKen Benes-12/9/2003
3471As the price of gold continues to rise beyond the price barrick received for theKen Benes-12/2/2003
3470Message 19546852d:oug-11/30/2003
3469Message 19545141Enigma-11/29/2003
3468The Truth spoken while the lies are still believed. (or) go GATA go Gata Bill god:oug-11/29/2003
3467>>Barrick settled for a price for their production that guaranteed a good tyc:>-11/24/2003
3466The only liability they have is to deliver a small percentage of their total golrusset-11/24/2003
3465Something I just read they have 500 mill liability off of hedging profits if notloantech-11/24/2003
3464Some people don't want to know the truth tyke, and few will hold a stock lonrusset-11/24/2003
3463?Tax liability ? What's this about ? Income tax is payable of profits I betyc:>-11/24/2003
3462Tyke maybe but I just posted my crap as there has been so much smoke and mirrorsloantech-11/24/2003
3461You are looking in the wrong direction, Tom. The idea of investing is to look ftyc:>-11/24/2003
3460That is not the point. The last 5 years NEM has way out performed ABX. ABX is noloantech-11/24/2003
3459The point you missed in your gloat is that Barrick always had the option of gettEnigma-11/24/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News