SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF)
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5164 11 0 SGGNF
Emcee:  Jim Barker Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3489 If you don't get that station, it can be heard here, I don't think it&#Cheeky Kid-4/14/1999
3488 NEWS: Kim Hart LIVE on Canada's Business Report tonight. (Mkt News Pub) SuJohn Lawrence-4/14/1999
3487 Gus, spilldabeans man, you're an expert. I always suspected you were aboutJohn Lawrence-4/14/1999
3486 I agree, NASD/SEC backlogged because all companies must now file to comply. TGus Cusimano-4/14/1999
3485 Answer: I left my XXXX in San Francisco. I can't outright tell you. netman-4/14/1999
3484 I DUNO.........remember Cheeky. NEW HIGHS SHORT TERM! I could see the smile acnetman-4/14/1999
3483 <i>The Indian issue is going to the Michigan Courts which is good for us.kidl-4/13/1999
3482 Not tomorrow, but soon. I guess that my conversation with another shareholder John Lawrence-4/13/1999
3481 All this bickering today and the stock closed UP. I wonder if the movement in Cheeky Kid-4/13/1999
3480 Spoke with the company. News coming out shortly (THURSDAY??). I think it's netman-4/13/1999
3479 LD, let's move forward. Let's support the company with positive feedbacnetman-4/13/1999
3478 Small correction I'll jump into the fray here: Netman, L.D. has been consiJohn Lawrence-4/13/1999
3477 One thing about it....I checked in to message manager....saw there were 18 messArchangel-4/13/1999
3476 Like I said sometimes you "gotta slap-em around a little bit". I hopenetman-4/13/1999
3475 Judging by the number of posts here recently, it looks like Sungold's boileDavid Fedorkiw-4/13/1999
3474 Don't feel sorry for me. Feel sorry for the people on this thread who put tnetman-4/13/1999
3473 Cheeky, your right. A few negative comments can't move the stock. It's netman-4/13/1999
3472 Netman, I feel sorry for you. Regards L. D.-4/13/1999
3471 Afternoon L.D. I guess since I have watched this thread from afar everyday,I iRampant-4/13/1999
3470 One thing still bugs me. Nobody here has the power or influence to "MOVE&Cheeky Kid-4/13/1999
3469 Thank you Gus, those are my feelings exactly. Your message speaks for itself. Tnetman-4/13/1999
3468 Let's all try to be positive. Let's all try to get the facts out to eaGus Cusimano-4/13/1999
3467 I think you can all learn a lesson from Mr. Lawrence. He is open minded and tacnetman-4/13/1999
3466 LD, why is it that whenever a person disagrees or comments on the negativity ofnetman-4/13/1999
3465 re. processing time I'm hearing now that a delay is very unlikely. UsuallyJohn Lawrence-4/13/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):