SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
The Environmentalist Thread
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
36926 110 17
Emcee:  Land Shark Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
34998Gov. Shumlin IS correct. That article proves it. From 1927 - 79 there were 11 huLand Shark-8/31/2011
34997Yesterday, Governor Pete Shumlin of Vermont made these remarks: I find it extrAlastair McIntosh-8/31/2011
34996We have been alerted by Ken Haapala of the Science and Environmental Policy ProAlastair McIntosh-8/31/2011
34995Human-Made Natural Disasters in Climate, Sachs Says By Allison Bennett and TomLand Shark-8/31/2011
34994“Whistle-Blowers Say Obama Fails to Save Scientists From Meddling” Posted on ALand Shark-8/31/2011
34993<b>Blu Homes</b> bluhomes.com Blu Homes builds green modular, preElmer Flugum-8/31/2011
34992 Must-Read Krugman: GOP is Now “Aggressively Anti-Science, Indeed Anti-KnowledgeLand Shark-8/31/2011
34991Thanks, still need to turn around the political situation in North America and gLand Shark-8/31/2011
34990Congrats on cleaning up the thread... looks like the complete bone heads are allLLCF-8/30/2011
34989Novel alloy could produce hydrogen fuel from sunlight Using advanced theoretiLand Shark-8/30/2011
34988Global Warming’s Heavy Cost By The Daily Beast (Bill McKibben) - August 26, 201Land Shark-8/30/2011
34987You're previous argument (invalid one at that) was that nobody was investingHPilot-8/30/2011
34986Welcome to FracFocus, the hydraulic fracturing chemical registry website. This wElmer Flugum-8/30/2011
34985While the term watts per hour ususally indicates someone confused with Kilowatt HPilot-8/30/2011
34984Solar May Produce Most of World’s Power by 2060, IEA Says By Ben Sills - ALand Shark-8/30/2011
34983You're previous argument (invalid one at that) was that nobody was investingLand Shark-8/30/2011
34982>Watts per hour is the rate of usage per hour. Watts is energy consumed perLand Shark-8/30/2011
34981there's no infrastructure for hydrogen. There is also no infrastructure forHPilot-8/30/2011
34980Sorry, actually it does make sense. Watts per hour is the rate of usage per houHPilot-8/30/2011
34979Fuel cells are cleaner, but they're costly and there's no infrastructureLand Shark-8/30/2011
34978Of course I suppose if you find a battery that can get really hot then perhaps yHPilot-8/30/2011
34977>How many watts per Kg per Hour or W/Kg Hr for example. If you mean storageLand Shark-8/30/2011
34976State of the art nano technology li polymer batteries under development are capaHPilot-8/30/2011
34975My error, 2400 W/kg should be 130 Wh/Kg, which is still pretty good.Land Shark-8/30/2011
34974>You will never be able to contain enough energy in a battery to satisfy mostLand Shark-8/30/2011
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News