SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silkroad
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
626 32 0
Emcee:  ahhaha Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
351 I make no claims to being a particularly smart guy on this thread, but I did spGrokSoup-4/15/1999
350 "So - the jury is out. It really does seem to be that for an analysis thaSrexley-4/15/1999
349 All of which is, in some sense a restatement of the misgivings many have expresKachina-4/15/1999
348 Jeff Kagan is a nice fellow, but he self-admittedly is not a photonics guy. GivGrokSoup-4/14/1999
347 Don't know, but I can tell you this... I'm about five months behind in Frank A. Coluccio-4/13/1999
346 Ouch! I think I noticed a bit of sarcasm in that response. Does anyone have anSrexley-4/13/1999
345 Finally, something new on the thread. I have been hoping to hear some news, andGeorge T. Santamaria-4/13/1999
344 Finally, something new on the thread. I have been hoping to hear some news, andSrexley-4/12/1999
343 Thanks for that catch. I know Jeff Kagan from several years of compuserve telecFrank A. Coluccio-4/11/1999
342 Jeffrey Kagan - Silkroad, The Potential To Change An Industry? cnnfn.com djane-4/11/1999
341 I had a structured approach to examining the SR proposition, but client-relatedFrank A. Coluccio-3/27/1999
340 Looked at their site. www.lightera.com No optical xmit - only interconnect eqKachina-3/25/1999
339 I just came across a clip on the Ciena thread that contains some pretty bold clFrank A. Coluccio-3/22/1999
338 Agreed, concerning the partnering aspect. Homegrown is not the way to go here fFrank A. Coluccio-3/22/1999
337 ....Or is it your interpretation that baseband digital signals such as bipoGeorge T. Santamaria-3/22/1999
336 >They have disclosed nothing that effectively superimposes or multiplexes daFrank A. Coluccio-3/20/1999
335 They have disclosed nothing that effectively superimposes or multiplexes data oahhaha-3/19/1999
334 I would tend to think that LU was doing their pre-announcement for exactly thatKachina-3/19/1999
333 Hello George, My questions are in regards to your statement: "I believe,Srexley-3/19/1999
332 .. I think that the disconnect from traditional data rates is most pronoGeorge T. Santamaria-3/19/1999
331 >>>>>It isn't much of a thread if it is one person talking tIlaine-3/18/1999
330 Hi George, in paraphrasing me, you noted: "... there's no MUX beyond Frank A. Coluccio-3/18/1999
329 I think that a number of posters discussing the LU issue have failed to notice George T. Santamaria-3/17/1999
328 Kachina, You've asked some legitimate questions, although your falFrank A. Coluccio-3/16/1999
327 This is a discussion that tries to target Silkroad. That's why it is calledahhaha-3/16/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News