SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc.
An SI Board Since March 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3027 64 0 MNTA
Emcee:  michael_f_murphy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
352Really? I just got it a few hrs ago. You r 2 fast for me Ij:-) Going to be a bordr.praveen-12/13/2006
351That Rodman Renshaw piece came out over a week ago. ijIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/13/2006
350First Take on Day 1 of Teva and Amphastar vs. Sanofi-Aventis Provided below are dr.praveen-12/13/2006
349There goes those darn isiders again! lol $900,000 was cashed in Friday. It'Go Market Go!-12/12/2006
348From the trial: AU testified in his depo that he had "drafted" his fiIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/12/2006
347 SNY Sanofi-Aventis: New study shows lovenox is more effective than unfractionatIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/12/2006
34607:31 CALP Caliper Life Sciences announces expanded sales of its LabChip and IIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/12/2006
345Good thinking. JonRobohogs-12/12/2006
344<i>knowing the sameness trial is still out there may keep some value of paSidney Street-12/12/2006
343Although the intermediate path is obviously different - i.e., knowing the sameneRobohogs-12/11/2006
342Right. Only the counterclaim count of inequitable conduct was tried. There is IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/11/2006
341Should there be 4 columns (or an additional timeframe), i.e., extension of pateRobohogs-12/11/2006
340>>teva will fight as hard Well I heard their patent trial counsel try theIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/11/2006
339Only thing is for certain teva will fight as hard as they can and so will sandozrkrw-12/11/2006
338<i>but I think they do have some patents they'll try to defend</i&gPseudo Biologist-12/11/2006
337Copaxone has been around forever but I think they do have some patents to defendrkrw-12/11/2006
336The great thing about a Copaxone ANDA is that there is no patent that needs to bIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/11/2006
335Maybe he should add a category, perpetuating fraud, just for you.rkrw-12/11/2006
334I think your numbers are reasonable. Only comment would be if both teva/amphastarkrw-12/11/2006
333IJ: Nice frame of reference. I've added a couple cols to make guesses at thefred hayes-12/11/2006
332What If +1+3 ? IMHO My hunch is that MNTA is making a better characterized geneGo Market Go!-12/11/2006
331In the bottommost case on your list—TEVA gets approval and MNTA gets rejected—thDewDiligence_on_SI-12/11/2006
330MNTA's FV considering 3 hurdles ahead 1 - Aventis patent 2 - TEVA/AmphastarIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/11/2006
329>># 1 I believe SNY will lose the trial. Why didn't you tell me beforGo Market Go!-12/8/2006
328If they lose here, there is then the main trial at some point later which Jim orRobohogs-12/8/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):