SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
PairGain Technologies
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
36349 70 0 PAIR
Emcee:  victoria castello Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
35399 hehehehe. I think we've all got to suck it up, focus on the long-term and njohn p. carney-1/6/2000
35398 hey jpc, what is it with the roving anti-whiner patrol on the thread lately? max power-1/6/2000
35397 I can't believe BND overtook PAIR. Come on PAIR..contracts! IBMikey-1/6/2000
35396 <Oh boy, the heat just keeps coming!!> That wouldn't be whining now john p. carney-1/6/2000
35395 Oh boy, the heat just keeps coming!! margin_man-1/6/2000
35394 You'll get your wish tomorrow, as LU just warned. Bill-1/6/2000
35393 well at least pair had some nice volume todaymax power-1/6/2000
35392 Need a couple more downticks. margin_man-1/6/2000
35391 here is your 12 buying opportunity.....or will you wait for 11?max power-1/6/2000
35390 From Yahoo That release isn't IR, it's PR. Every now and then the braJoseph Moran-1/6/2000
35389 testJoseph Moran-1/6/2000
35388 Thursday January 6, 10:00 am Eastern Time Company Press Release SOURCE: PairGaiEsway-1/6/2000
35387 Judging from the Naz future index, I may get it tomorrow. BTW, I don't thimargin_man-1/5/2000
35386 John I second that WHINE. Or rather give me a beer. Or two. Maybe CNBC hasn&helkel-1/5/2000
35385 excellent post John, I couldn't agree more. I have never understood why pasmax power-1/5/2000
35384 Where did you get that idea? eomjohn p. carney-1/5/2000
35383 john p, Should we number you among those critical of current management?FirstDiogenes-1/5/2000
35382 <If we drop below 11, tho, next stop might be the 9's.> YOU CAN'john p. carney-1/5/2000
35381 <<but bad thing I missed the opp. to buy back at 12. >> don't max power-1/5/2000
35380 Tuck, I hope you took today opp. to execute your plan. Good thing I sold yestermargin_man-1/5/2000
35379 You just did.FirstDiogenes-1/5/2000
35378 I'll fax you a wet noodle, and you can flagellate yourselves. (Can I say tJim S-1/5/2000
35377 john & Mark, You two both write yourselves letters of reprimand. I'llFirstDiogenes-1/5/2000
35376 My apologies.. Your absolutely correct. I don't want this board end up likeMark-1/5/2000
35375 Trade Show PR Is Pair at this show? I would ask their PR department but they pJoseph Moran-1/5/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News