SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
ImmunityBio converts from Immunomedics
An SI Board Since February 2023
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1560 51 0 IBRX
Emcee:  TinfoilHat Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
354Just a guess but there is a large short interest in the 10k may have provided inzagnut1-3/20/2024
353?? anyone see anything to explain today's jump? [ not complaining] ....urslor-3/20/2024
352This is what I copied off of the most recent 10-K from the IBRX website: Our prStikkmann23/20/2024
351The company also develops therapeutic agents, which are in Phase II or III cliniurslor13/20/2024
350IBRX 10K is out 10KDavidoff-3/19/2024
349On the Yahoo message board today it was pointed out that the pipeline page of Immannamal-3/19/2024
348therealdeal.commannamal13/15/2024
347I found this on another message board and thought it was worth posting here. WhiFitzhughlaw63/12/2024
346is that a good sign? The SI is so firkin high.. at least at last count... inteJJINV-3/1/2024
345no longer lending IBRX in ameritrade....urslor-2/29/2024
344Seems the upcoming PDUFA due April 23 will make or break the share price In thegalt-2/28/2024
343Seems the upcoming PDUFA due April 23 will make or break the share price In thegalt22/28/2024
342Says sell recommendation... Don't know this author... seekingalpha.comJJINV-2/28/2024
341Correction: I meant, IOVA not CBAY. The calls on CBAY were even more expensive, ghettogoulash-2/27/2024
340You might consider May 17 5.00 calls, which are only about $1.20. You *should* hghettogoulash-2/27/2024
339Thanks for sharing that link Fitz. The value of these types of forums on displayTinfoilHat32/27/2024
338Well, that's one way to spend a weekend! You're correct that I may be oFitzhughlaw12/27/2024
337Weakness not weekends. Sorry.galt-2/27/2024
336Let’s all remember that this data that Fitzhugh brought up is from 2023. Not sugalt12/27/2024
335Isn't this the same company in 2023 that failed inspections!!! AGC Biologicurslor-2/26/2024
334I can't believe Enrique Dilone wouldn't be on top of correcting these tybgscolt-2/26/2024
333So much of it is just so slipshod. I still can't get over how poorly the CDFitzhughlaw12/26/2024
332Question is , a YEAR later,... did they? Was it not the same that failed anotJJINV-2/26/2024
331Yes, which clearly didn't get corrected in time. The CRL was issued on or abFitzhughlaw-2/26/2024
330The inspection dates on the document are February 2023, so these are the findingMaturin-2/26/2024
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):