SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
DOCS - A TURNAROUND PLAY
An SI Board Since December 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1156 3 0 DOCS
Emcee:  Andrew Q. Viet Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
356 <i>Just finished reading a article in Investors Digest of Canada about PcMichael Watkins-5/10/1998
355 Saw that too. Old news which I thought was actually positive. Just shows some oSultan-5/8/1998
354 Just finished reading a article in Investors Digest of Canada about PcDocs. A amicromike-5/8/1998
353 NF, if you read the product overview at the link you posted, it is clear that EMichael Watkins-5/6/1998
352 I don't know much about the binder product, but I'm sure Docmanager casand wedge-5/6/1998
351 wedge, Do you know if DOCS Binder is truly a new product or just an enhancemenwaitwatchwander-5/6/1998
350 Michael, I concur ... and ... that's why they call it yahoo ... waitwatchwander-5/6/1998
349 David, I believe you are correct that they have had a morale problem for a longMichael Watkins-5/6/1998
348 They were profiled in Vancouver Sun, business section the other day. I believe Sultan-5/6/1998
347 NF I know for a fact that everything they are doing on the tech front is good vMichael Watkins-5/6/1998
346 PC DOCS has been integrated with WaterMark since the product was originally resand wedge-5/6/1998
345 Folks, I think you need to look at the financial picture and recent marketing eMichael Watkins-5/6/1998
344 OT Sultan are you watching Pivotal? I used to work for Norm Francis... there arMichael Watkins-5/6/1998
343 Sultan, Thanx for clarifying the insider buying. I sometimes get confused givwaitwatchwander-5/6/1998
342 I must admit coming write-offs and earnings are something I'd like to get oSultan-5/6/1998
341 Sultan, I think they have yet to prove their way on the technology front. No dwaitwatchwander-5/6/1998
340 There is no question DOCSF is a bargain at these multiples. Growth is there butSultan-5/6/1998
339 It always amazes me how the market prices growth, revenue and profit. Now do owaitwatchwander-5/6/1998
338 OTEXF currently has a market capitalization of $342m (USD) while DOCSF is only David LaSalle-5/6/1998
337 David, I think you may have crossed columns in your Multiplan. No doubt, OTXTwaitwatchwander-5/6/1998
336 Michael, I think you misinterpreted what I was meaning by that paragraph. My David LaSalle-5/6/1998
335 Thanks for the update. I too get a sense that may be they will finally get theiSultan-5/6/1998
334 <i>(BTW a lot of the technology discussed in the two press releases todayMichael Watkins-5/6/1998
333 The major area of growth in the DM industry is not in "image" specifiMichael Watkins-5/6/1998
332 Anyone with USD 70 million in the bank should be able to bring out a complete dDavid LaSalle-5/6/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News